ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Needs assessment of general practitioners in Pakistan: A descriptive cross-sectional survey.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Scope, training, and systemic challenges of family medicine in South Asia: Perspectives of general practitioners and family physicians.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Perceived Continuing Medical Education Necessity Among General Practitioners in Southeast Henan, China.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Perception of medical students about family medicine in Karachi, Pakistan: Medical students' perception about family medicine.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Enhancing knowledge of hypertension among general practitioners in Pakistan through a Train-The-Trainer initiative.PloS one · 2025Article
- Evaluation of FamMed essentials: a blended-learning program for capacity building of general practitioners in Pakistan.BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the growing and complex nature of medicine, it is imperative for physicians to update their knowledge and skills to reflect current standards of care. In Pakistan, 71% of primary care needs are met by general practitioners (GPs). GPs are not required to complete structured training and no regulatory mandates exist for continuing medical education. We conducted a needs assessment to evaluate the readiness for competency-based updating of knowledge and skills, and the use of technology by practicing GPs in Pakistan. Methods: A cross-sectional survey inviting registered GPs across Pakistan was administered online and in-person. Questions pertained to physician demographics, practice characteristics, confidence in knowledge and skills, and preferred modes of updating knowledge and barriers. Descriptive analyses were performed for GPs and patient-related characteristics and bivariate analyses to evaluate the relationship between parameters of interest. Results: Of the 459 GPs who responded, 35% were practicing for <5 years and 34% reported practicing for >10 years. Only 7% had a post-graduate qualification in family medicine. GPs reported needing practice in neonatal examination (52%), neurological exam (53%), depression screening (53%), growth charts (53%) and peak flow meter use (53%), interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs, 58%) and insulin dosing for diabetes (50%). High workload (44%) was the most common barrier to updating clinical knowledge. Sixty-two percent used the Internet on a regular basis. Conclusion: Most GPs have no structured training and encounter gaps in knowledge and skills in clinical practice. Flexible, hybrid, and competency-based continuing medical education programs can be used to update knowledge and skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.