ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Relative risk of postpartum maternal morbidity among cesarean-delivered women: A multisite prospective cohort study in a large district, India.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07651241 (Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Elective and Emergency Cesarean Section in Women's Health Hospital), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Elective and Emergency Cesarean Section in Women's Health Hospital
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Family doctors manage mild to moderate postpartum morbidities that do not receive attention. The morbidities are higher after cesareans, which are increasing in number. The aim was to calculate the relative risk of various maternal morbidities occurring during 6 months postpartum among cesarean-delivered women in Pune District, India. Material and Methods: This was a large multisite study, which included all 11 non-teaching government hospitals performing at least five cesarean sections per month, one teaching government hospital, and one private teaching hospital. All eligible cesarean delivered and an equal number of age and parity matched vaginally delivered women were the participants. The obstetricians interrogated women before discharge, after 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months. Results: In this study 3,112 women participated. At any visit and among any group lost to follow-up proportion was <10%. There was no major intra-operative complication among vaginally delivered women. The relative risks of acute and severe morbidity as intensive care unit admission and blood transfusion among cesarean-delivered women were 2.59 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.96 to 3.44], 4.33 (95% CI = 2.17 to 8.92), respectively. The adjusted relative risk of surgical site pain and infection at 4 weeks; surgical site pain at 6 weeks; and lower abdominal pain, breast engorgement/mastitis, urinary incontinence, and weakness at 6 months among cesarean-delivered women was higher ( Conclusion: Health care workers, including family doctors, during follow-up of cesarean-delivered women, must assess for pain, induration/discharge at the surgical site, urinary incontinence, and breast engorgement/mastitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.