Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36993952›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2023

Safety and efficacy of radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jing Wu, Tingting Ni, Rong Deng, Yan Li, Qin Zhong, Fei Tang, Qi Zhang, Chunju Fang, Yingbo Xue, Yan Zha and 1 more

Full text readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. [Radiotherapy plus durvalumab for the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer-The DOLPHIN trial].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jing WuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Tingting NiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Rong DengDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Yan LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Qin ZhongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Fei TangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Qi ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Chunju FangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Yingbo XueDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Yan ZhaDepartment of Nephrology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It is now widely accepted that radiotherapy (RT) can provoke a systemic immune response, which gives a strong rationale for the combination of RT and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, RT is a double-edged sword that not only enhances systemic antitumor immune response, but also promotes immunosuppression to some extent. Nevertheless, many aspects regarding the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy remain unknown. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in order to assess the safety and efficacy of RT/chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and ICI combination therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: PubMed and several other databases were searched (according to specific criteria) to find relevant studies published prior to the 28 Results: 3,652 articles were identified for screening and 25 trials containing 1,645 NSCLC patients were identified. For stage II-III NSCLC, the one- and two-year overall survival (OS) was 83.25% (95% confidence interval (CI): 79.42%-86.75%) and 66.16% (95% CI: 62.3%-69.92%), respectively. For stage IV NSCLC, the one- and two-year OS was 50% and 25%. In our study, the pooled rate of grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) and grade 5 AEs was 30.18% (95% CI: 10.04%-50.33%, I Conclusion: This study suggests that the addition of ICIs to RT/CRT for NSCLC patients may be both safe and feasible. We also summarize details of different RT combinations with ICIs to treat NSCLC. These findings may help guide the design of future trials, the testing of concurrent or sequential combinations for ICIs and RT/CRT could be particularly useful to guide the treatment of NSCLC patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsefficacyimmune checkpoint inhibitorsmeta-analysisnon-small cell lung cancerradiation therapysafety

Identifiers

PMID36993952
PMCPMC10040597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read859
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.