Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36993939›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2023

Retrospective cohort study to devise a treatment decision score predicting adverse 24-month radiological activity in early multiple sclerosis.

Alexander Hapfelmeier, Begum Irmak On, Mark Mühlau, Jan S Kirschke, Achim Berthele, Christiane Gasperi, Ulrich Mansmann, Alexander Wuschek, Matthias Bussas, Martin Boeker and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. LST-AI: a Deep Learning Ensemble for Accurate MS Lesion Segmentation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander HapfelmeierInstitute of AI and Informatics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81675, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6765-6352
Begum Irmak OnInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in Munich, Munich, Germany.
Mark MühlauDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan S KirschkeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Achim BertheleDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christiane GasperiDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ulrich MansmannInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-8906
Alexander WuschekDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Matthias BussasDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Martin BoekerInstitute of AI and Informatics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Antonios BayasDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Makbule SenelDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2737-7495
Joachim HavlaInstitute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4386-1340
Markus C KowarikDepartment of Neurology & Stroke and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1389-5539
Klaus KuhnInstitute of AI and Informatics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ingrid GatzInstitute of AI and Informatics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Helmut SpenglerInstitute of AI and Informatics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Benedikt WiestlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lioba GrundlDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Dominik SeppDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Bernhard HemmerDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
TUM Klinikum · DETechnical University of Munich · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity of Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neuroinflammatory disease affecting about 2.8 million people worldwide. Disease course after the most common diagnoses of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) is highly variable and cannot be reliably predicted. This impairs early personalized treatment decisions. Objectives: The main objective of this study was to algorithmically support clinical decision-making regarding the options of early platform medication or no immediate treatment of patients with early RRMS and CIS. Design: Retrospective monocentric cohort study within the Data Integration for Future Medicine (DIFUTURE) Consortium. Methods: Multiple data sources of routine clinical, imaging and laboratory data derived from a large and deeply characterized cohort of patients with MS were integrated to conduct a retrospective study to create and internally validate a treatment decision score [Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Decision Score (MS-TDS)] through model-based random forests (RFs). The MS-TDS predicts the probability of no new or enlarging lesions in cerebral magnetic resonance images (cMRIs) between 6 and 24 months after the first cMRI. Results: Data from 65 predictors collected for 475 patients between 2008 and 2017 were included. No medication and platform medication were administered to 277 (58.3%) and 198 (41.7%) patients. The MS-TDS predicted individual outcomes with a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.624. The respective RF prediction model provides patient-specific MS-TDS and probabilities of treatment success. The latter may increase by 5-20% for half of the patients if the treatment considered superior by the MS-TDS is used. Conclusion: Routine clinical data from multiple sources can be successfully integrated to build prediction models to support treatment decision-making. In this study, the resulting MS-TDS estimates individualized treatment success probabilities that can identify patients who benefit from early platform medication. External validation of the MS-TDS is required, and a prospective study is currently being conducted. In addition, the clinical relevance of the MS-TDS needs to be established.

Indexed as

machine learningmultiple sclerosispersonalized medicinepredictive factorpredictive modeltreatment effect

Identifiers

PMID36993939
PMCPMC10041597
OpenAlexW4360918283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.