Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36993873›Full record

ReviewCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2023

Pregnancy-Associated Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Women: A Literature Review.

Katherine Zeven

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pregnancy-related spontaneous coronary artery dissection: insights from the SCAD-POL registry and a literature review.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: dissecting an underdiagnosed problem.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pregnancy-Related Heart Disease in the Emergency Department.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Spontaneous Coronary Dissection Review: A Complex Picture.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine ZevenWarren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Brown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) primarily affects women younger than age 50 years, is often misdiagnosed or undiagnosed, and research on this topic is limited. Objective: A literature review was conducted to identify unique factors that can facilitate pregnancy-related SCAD (P-SCAD) diagnosis as well as differentiate it from nonpregnancy-related SCAD (NP-SCAD). Methods: A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar databases that focused on NP-SCAD and P-SCAD cases reported in North America between 2006 and 2021 using the terms Results: A total of 108 journal articles reporting on individual cases, case series examining independent SCAD registries, as well as literature reviews were identified. These included 1547 SCAD cases in women, 510 of which were identified as P-SCAD. SCAD occurs predominantly in women, and thus presents a diagnostic challenge because women are not typically considered at risk for developing cardiovascular diseases and may present with symptoms that mimic other medical conditions. This issue is further exacerbated when SCAD develops during pregnancy or the postpartum period (ie, P-SCAD to differentiate it from SCAD occurring in other periods of woman's life such as NP-SCAD) because P-SCAD patients often present with less typical cardiac symptoms yet tend to experience more severe illness that can jeopardize their health and that of their baby. P-SCAD was associated with higher ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction rates, higher troponin levels, and a greater risk of cardiogenic shock compared with NP-SCAD cohorts. It was also evident that the failure rates associated with invasive procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery were higher in P-SCAD patients, whereas the mortality rates are comparable to NP-SCAD cohorts if diagnosed and treated appropriately. Conclusions: Because younger women are rarely screened, they are at greater risk from SCAD, especially if this condition develops during pregnancy or ≤30 days following delivery. It is essential that medical professionals providing care for pregnant women understand P-SCAD risk factors and provide medical counseling for pregnant women or those planning a pregnancy to be better equipped to recognize its more subtle signs and symptoms, thus facilitating timely specialist referral, diagnosis, and treatment. (

Indexed as

postpartum and pregnancySCADspontaneous coronary artery dissectionspontaneous coronary artery dissection and pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36993873
PMCPMC10041465
OpenAlexW4322743992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read66
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.