Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36993838›Full record

ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2023

Semi-supervised COVID-19 volumetric pulmonary lesion estimation on CT images using probabilistic active contour and CNN segmentation.

Diomar Enrique Rodriguez-Obregon, Aldo Rodrigo Mejia-Rodriguez, Leopoldo Cendejas-Zaragoza, Juan Gutiérrez Mejía, Edgar Román Arce-Santana, Sonia Charleston-Villalobos, Tomas Aljama-Corrales, Alejandro Gabutti, Alejandro Santos-Díaz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Diomar Enrique Rodriguez-ObregonFaculty of Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, S.L.P., Mexico.
Aldo Rodrigo Mejia-RodriguezFaculty of Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, S.L.P., Mexico.
Leopoldo Cendejas-ZaragozaTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Mexico City, Mexico.
Juan Gutiérrez MejíaTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Mexico City, Mexico.
Edgar Román Arce-SantanaFaculty of Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, S.L.P., Mexico.
Sonia Charleston-VillalobosUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.
Tomas Aljama-CorralesUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alejandro GabuttiDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alejandro Santos-DíazTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Mexico City, Mexico.
Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí · MXInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MXTecnológico de Monterrey · MXUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: A semi-supervised two-step methodology is proposed to obtain a volumetric estimation of COVID-19-related lesions on Computed Tomography (CT) images. Methods: First, damaged tissue was segmented from CT images using a probabilistic active contours approach. Second, lung parenchyma was extracted using a previously trained U-Net. Finally, volumetric estimation of COVID-19 lesions was calculated considering the lung parenchyma masks.Our approach was validated using a publicly available dataset containing 20 CT COVID-19 images previously labeled and manually segmented. Then, it was applied to 295 COVID-19 patients CT scans admitted to an intensive care unit. We compared the lesion estimation between deceased and survived patients for high and low-resolution images. Results: A comparable median Dice similarity coefficient of 0.66 for the 20 validation images was achieved. For the 295 images dataset, results show a significant difference in lesion percentages between deceased and survived patients, with a Conclusion: The proposed approach could help estimate the lesion size caused by COVID-19 in CT images and may be considered an alternative to getting a volumetric segmentation for this novel disease without the requirement of large amounts of COVID-19 labeled data to train an artificial intelligence algorithm. The low variation between the estimated percentage of lesions in high and low-resolution CT images suggests that the proposed approach is robust, and it may provide valuable information to differentiate between survived and deceased patients.

Indexed as

Active contoursComputed tomographyCOVID-19Semi-supervised segmentationVolumetric lesion segmentation

Identifiers

PMID36993838
PMCPMC10030333
OpenAlexW4353094471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.