Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36993822›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare2023

Barriers to and enablers of type 2 diabetes screening among women with prior gestational diabetes: A qualitative study applying the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Amelia J Lake, Amelia Williams, Adriana C H Neven, Jacqueline A Boyle, James A Dunbar, Christel Hendrieckx, Melinda Morrison, Sharleen L O'Reilly, Helena Teede, Jane Speight

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Postpartum OGTT Non-Adherence in Regional and Rural Australia: A Longitudinal Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amelia J LakeSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Amelia WilliamsSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Adriana C H NevenMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Jacqueline A BoyleMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
James A DunbarDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
Christel HendrieckxSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Melinda MorrisonDiabetes Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Sharleen L O'ReillySchool of Exercise & Nutrition Science, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.
Helena TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Jane SpeightSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Guidelines recommend postnatal diabetes screening (oral glucose tolerance test or HbA1c) typically 6-12 weeks after birth, with screening maintained at regular intervals thereafter. Despite this, around half of women are not screened, representing a critical missed opportunity for early identification of prediabetes or type 2 diabetes. While policy and practice-level recommendations are comprehensive, those at the personal-level primarily focus on increasing screening knowledge and risk perception, potentially missing other influential behavioral determinants. We aimed to identify modifiable, personal-level factors impacting postpartum type 2 diabetes screening among Australian women with prior gestational diabetes and recommend intervention functions and behavior change techniques to underpin intervention content. Research design and methods: Semi-structured interviews with participants recruited via Australia's National Gestational Diabetes Register, using a guide based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Using an inductive-deductive approach, we coded data to TDF domains. We used established criteria to identify 'important' domains which we then mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model. Results: Nineteen women participated: 34 ± 4 years, 19 ± 4 months postpartum, 63% Australian-born, 90% metropolitan, 58% screened for T2D according to guidelines. Eight TDF domains were identified: 'knowledge', 'memory, attention, and decision-making processes', 'environmental context and resources', 'social influences', 'emotion', 'beliefs about consequences', 'social role and identity', and 'beliefs about capabilities'. Study strengths include a methodologically rigorous design; limitations include low recruitment and homogenous sample. Conclusions: This study identified numerous modifiable barriers and enablers to postpartum T2D screening for women with prior GDM. By mapping to the COM-B, we identified intervention functions and behavior change techniques to underpin intervention content. These findings provide a valuable evidence base for developing messaging and interventions that target the behavioral determinants most likely to optimize T2D screening uptake among women with prior GDM. .

Indexed as

behavior therapyfemalegestational diabetesglucose tolerance testpersuasive communicationpostpartum periodqualitativetype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID36993822
PMCPMC10012118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read9
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.