Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36993750›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Structure-Based Neural Network Protein-Carbohydrate Interaction Predictions at the Residue Level.

Samuel W Canner, Sudhanshu Shanker, Jeffrey J Gray

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel W CannerProgram in Molecular Biophysics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Sudhanshu ShankerDept. of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Jeffrey J GrayProgram in Molecular Biophysics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.

Funding

Prediction of the Structures of Protein ComplexesR35GM141881 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFREY J GRAY · 2021 to 2026
$7.6M
Program of Molecular BiophysicsT32GM135131 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Karen G. Fleming · 2020 to 2026
$5.4M
Exploiting antibody catalysis for treating CryptococcosisR01AI162381 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CASADEVALL, ARTURO · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI162381NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141881NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbohydrates dynamically and transiently interact with proteins for cell-cell recognition, cellular differentiation, immune response, and many other cellular processes. Despite the molecular importance of these interactions, there are currently few reliable computational tools to predict potential carbohydrate binding sites on any given protein. Here, we present two deep learning models named CArbohydrate-Protein interaction Site IdentiFier (CAPSIF) that predict carbohydrate binding sites on proteins: (1) a 3D-UNet voxel-based neural network model (CAPSIF:V) and (2) an equivariant graph neural network model (CAPSIF:G). While both models outperform previous surrogate methods used for carbohydrate binding site prediction, CAPSIF:V performs better than CAPSIF:G, achieving test Dice scores of 0.597 and 0.543 and test set Matthews correlation coefficients (MCCs) of 0.599 and 0.538, respectively. We further tested CAPSIF:V on AlphaFold2-predicted protein structures. CAPSIF:V performed equivalently on both experimentally determined structures and AlphaFold2 predicted structures. Finally, we demonstrate how CAPSIF models can be used in conjunction with local glycan-docking protocols, such as GlycanDock, to predict bound protein-carbohydrate structures.

Identifiers

PMID36993750
PMCPMC10054975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.