ArticleResearch square2023
Single cell and spatial alternative splicing analysis with long read sequencing.
Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Long-read sequencing has become a powerful tool for alternative splicing analysis. However, technical and computational challenges have limited our ability to explore alternative splicing at single cell and spatial resolution. The higher sequencing error of long reads, especially high indel rates, have limited the accuracy of cell barcode and unique molecular identifier (UMI) recovery. Read truncation and mapping errors, the latter exacerbated by the higher sequencing error rates, can cause the false detection of spurious new isoforms. Downstream, there is yet no rigorous statistical framework to quantify splicing variation within and between cells/spots. In light of these challenges, we developed Longcell, a statistical framework and computational pipeline for accurate isoform quantification for single cell and spatial spot barcoded long read sequencing data. Longcell performs computationally efficient cell/spot barcode extraction, UMI recovery, and UMI-based truncation- and mapping-error correction. Through a statistical model that accounts for varying read coverage across cells/spots, Longcell rigorously quantifies the level of inter-cell/spot versus intra-cell/ spot diversity in exon-usage and detects changes in splicing distributions between cell populations. Applying Longcell to single cell long-read data from multiple contexts, we found that intra-cell splicing heterogeneity, where multiple isoforms co-exist within the same cell, is ubiquitous for highly expressed genes. On matched single cell and Visium long read sequencing for a tissue of colorectal cancer metastasis to the liver, Longcell found concordant signals between the two data modalities. Finally, on a perturbation experiment for 9 splicing factors, Longcell identified regulatory targets that are validated by targeted sequencing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.