ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
BIBSNet: A Deep Learning Baby Image Brain Segmentation Network for MRI Scans.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
30 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Brain segmentation of infant magnetic resonance (MR) images is vitally important for studying typical and atypical brain development. The infant brain undergoes many changes throughout the first years of postnatal life, making tissue segmentation difficult for most existing algorithms. Here we introduce a deep neural network BIBSNet ( Experimental Design: Included in model training and testing were MR brain images from 90 participants with an age range of 0-8 months (median age 4.6 months). Using the BOBs repository of manually annotated real images along with synthetic segmentation images produced using SynthSeg, the model was trained using a 10-fold procedure. Model performance of segmentations was assessed by comparing BIBSNet, joint label fusion (JLF) inferred segmentation to ground truth segmentations using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Additionally, MR data along with the FreeSurfer compatible segmentations were processed with the DCAN labs infant-ABCD-BIDS processing pipeline from ground truth, JLF, and BIBSNet to further assess model performance on derivative data, including cortical thickness, resting state connectivity and brain region volumes. Principal Observations: BIBSNet segmentations outperforms JLF across all regions based on DSC comparisons. Additionally, with processed derived metrics, BIBSNet segmentations outperforms JLF segmentations across nearly all metrics. Conclusions: BIBSNet segmentation shows marked improvement over JLF across all age groups analyzed. The BIBSNet model is 600x faster compared to JLF, produces FreeSurfer-compatible segmentation labels, and can be easily included in other processing pipelines. BIBSNet provides a viable alternative for segmenting the brain in the earliest stages of development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.