Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36993540›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

BIBSNet: A Deep Learning Baby Image Brain Segmentation Network for MRI Scans.

Timothy J Hendrickson, Paul Reiners, Lucille A Moore, Jacob T Lundquist, Begim Fayzullobekova, Anders J Perrone, Erik G Lee, Julia Moser, Trevor K M Day, Dimitrios Alexopoulos and 20 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy J HendricksonORCID 0000-0001-6862-6526
Paul Reiners
Jacob T Lundquist
Begim Fayzullobekova
Anders J Perrone
Julia Moser
Trevor K M Day
Dimitrios Alexopoulos
Omid Kardan
Taylor A ChamberlainORCID 0000-0003-3610-0911
Anurima Mummaneni
Henrique A Caldas
Brad Bower
Sally Stoyell
Tabitha Martin
Sooyeon Sung
Ermias A Fair
Kenevan Carter
Jonathan Uriarte-Lopez
Essa Yacoub
Monica D RosenbergORCID 0000-0001-6179-4025
Christopher D SmyserORCID 0000-0002-4716-5190
Alice Graham
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Chicago · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

The Healthy Brain and Child Development National Consortium Administrative CoreU24DA055325 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHRISTINA CHAMBERS, CHARLES Alexander NELSON · 2021 to 2026
$40.8M
Preclinical CoreP50HD103573 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GABRIEL S DICHTER · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
17/24 Healthy Brain and Child Development National ConsortiumU01DA055371 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Michael K. Georgieff, Sylia Wilson · 2021 to 2026
$8.6M
UNC/UMN Baby Connectome ProjectU01MH110274 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELISON, JED THOMAS, GILMORE, JOHN HORACE · 2016 to 2019
$4.5M
Infant Brain and Behavioral Signatures of Later Emerging Risk for PsychopathologyR01MH104324 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ELISON, JED THOMAS · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103573NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA055371NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA055325NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104324NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH110274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Brain segmentation of infant magnetic resonance (MR) images is vitally important for studying typical and atypical brain development. The infant brain undergoes many changes throughout the first years of postnatal life, making tissue segmentation difficult for most existing algorithms. Here we introduce a deep neural network BIBSNet ( Experimental Design: Included in model training and testing were MR brain images from 90 participants with an age range of 0-8 months (median age 4.6 months). Using the BOBs repository of manually annotated real images along with synthetic segmentation images produced using SynthSeg, the model was trained using a 10-fold procedure. Model performance of segmentations was assessed by comparing BIBSNet, joint label fusion (JLF) inferred segmentation to ground truth segmentations using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Additionally, MR data along with the FreeSurfer compatible segmentations were processed with the DCAN labs infant-ABCD-BIDS processing pipeline from ground truth, JLF, and BIBSNet to further assess model performance on derivative data, including cortical thickness, resting state connectivity and brain region volumes. Principal Observations: BIBSNet segmentations outperforms JLF across all regions based on DSC comparisons. Additionally, with processed derived metrics, BIBSNet segmentations outperforms JLF segmentations across nearly all metrics. Conclusions: BIBSNet segmentation shows marked improvement over JLF across all age groups analyzed. The BIBSNet model is 600x faster compared to JLF, produces FreeSurfer-compatible segmentation labels, and can be easily included in other processing pipelines. BIBSNet provides a viable alternative for segmenting the brain in the earliest stages of development.

Identifiers

PMID36993540
PMCPMC10055337
OpenAlexW4360798582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.