Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36993392›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

Biologically informed NeuralODEs for genome-wide regulatory dynamics.

Intekhab Hossain, Viola Fanfani, John Quackenbush, Rebekka Burkholz

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Intekhab HossainDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0895-8128
Viola FanfaniDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
John QuackenbushDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2702-5879
Rebekka BurkholzHelmholtz Center for Information Security (CISPA), Saarbrücken, Germany.

Funding

Respiratory Computational Discovery CoreP01HL114501 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CHOI, MARY E · 2013 to 2025
$24.9M
Unraveling the Complexities of Risk and Mechanism in CancerR35CA220523 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN · 2018 to 2024
$6.0M
WebMeV: A Robust Platform for Intuitive Genomic Data AnalysisU24CA231846 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Networks Tools to Understand Sex- and Gender-Specific Drivers of DiseaseR01HG011393 · NHGRI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI DEMEO, DAWN L, QUACKENBUSH, JOHN · 2021 to 2024
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA220523NCI NIH HHS U24 CA231846NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011393NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL114501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models that are formulated as ordinary differential equations (ODEs) can accurately explain temporal gene expression patterns and promise to yield new insights into important cellular processes, disease progression, and intervention design. Learning such ODEs is challenging, since we want to predict the evolution of gene expression in a way that accurately encodes the causal gene-regulatory network (GRN) governing the dynamics and the nonlinear functional relationships between genes. Most widely used ODE estimation methods either impose too many parametric restrictions or are not guided by meaningful biological insights, both of which impedes scalability and/or explainability. To overcome these limitations, we developed PHOENIX, a modeling framework based on neural ordinary differential equations (NeuralODEs) and Hill-Langmuir kinetics, that can flexibly incorporate prior domain knowledge and biological constraints to promote sparse, biologically interpretable representations of ODEs. We test accuracy of PHOENIX in a series of

Identifiers

PMID36993392
PMCPMC10055646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.