ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Time or distance encoding by hippocampal neurons with heterogenous ramping rates.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To navigate their environments effectively, animals frequently integrate distance or time information to seek food and avoid threats. This integration process is thought to engage hippocampal neurons that fire at specific distances or times. Using virtual-reality environments, we uncovered two previously unknown functional subpopulations of CA1 pyramidal neurons that encode distance or time through a novel two-phase coding mechanism. The first subpopulation exhibits a collective increase in activity that peaks at similar times, marking the onset of integration; subsequently, individual neurons gradually diverge in their firing rates due to heterogeneous decay rates, enabling time encoding. In contrast, the second subpopulation initially decreases its activity before gradually ramping up. Closed-loop optogenetic experiments revealed that inactivating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons disrupts the first subpopulation, behaviorally impairing integration accuracy, while inactivating parvalbumin-positive (PV) interneurons disrupts the second subpopulation, impairing behavior during integration initiation. These findings support the conclusion that SST interneurons establish an integration window, while PV interneurons generate a reset to reinitiate integration. This study elucidates parallel neural circuits that facilitate distinct aspects of distance or time integration, offering new insights into the computations underlying navigation and memory encoding.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.