Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36993185›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

Big Advocacy, Little Recognition: The Hidden Work of Black Patients in Precision Medicine.

Lynette Hammond Gerido, Kenneth Resnicow, Elena Stoffel, Tiah Tomlin, Robert Cook-Deegan, Melissa Cline, Amy Coffin, Jill Holdren, Mary Anderlik Majumder, Zhe He

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Lynette Hammond GeridoUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health.
Kenneth ResnicowUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health.
Elena StoffelUniversity of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center.
Tiah TomlinMy Breast Years Ahead.
Robert Cook-DeeganArizona State University.
Melissa ClineUniversity of California, Santa Cruz.
Amy CoffinVirginia Commonwealth University.
Jill HoldrenThe Light Collective.
Mary Anderlik MajumderBaylor College of Medicine.
Zhe HeFlorida State University.
University of Michigan · USArizona State University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USBreast Center · CHFlorida State University · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

University of Michigan Training Program in ELSI ResearchT32HG010030 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBERTS, SCOTT · 2018 to 2022
$962k
NCI NIH HHS L60 CA274876NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG010030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health genomics prioritizes effective and ethical translation of genomic science into population health precision medicine. With the rapid development of cost-effective, next-generation genome sequencing, calls are growing for greater inclusion of Black people in genomic research, policy, and practice. Genetic testing is often the first step in precision medicine. This study explores racial differences in patient concerns about genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer. Employing a community-based participatory mixed methods research design, we developed a semi-structured survey that was shared broadly. There were 81 survey respondents, of which, forty-nine (60%) self-identified as Black, twenty-six (32%) indicated they had a history of a breast cancer diagnosis, or had received BRCA genetic testing. Black participants who expressed concerns about genetic testing were fairly equally distributed between concerns that could be addressed with genetic counseling (24%) and concerns about the subsequent use of their genetic data (27%). The concerns expressed by the participants in our study underscore a need for transparent disclosures and assurances regarding the use and handling of genetic data. These findings should be viewed in context with patient-led efforts to overcome systemic inequities in cancer care, as Black cancer patients have joined forces with advocates and researchers to develop protective health data initiatives and to improve their representation in genomic datasets. Future research should prioritize the information needs and concerns of Black cancer patients. Interventions should be developed to support their hidden work as a means to reduce barriers and improve representation in precision medicine.

Identifiers

PMID36993185
PMCPMC10055541
OpenAlexW4327948232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.