Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36993145›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2023

Deriving spatially explicit direct and indirect interaction networks from animal movement data.

Anni Yang, Mark Q Wilber, Kezia R Manlove, Ryan S Miller, Raoul Boughton, James Beasley, Joseph Northrup, Kurt C VerCauteren, George Wittemyer, Kim Pepin

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anni YangDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sustainability University of Oklahoma Oklahoma Norman USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9535-2193
Mark Q WilberForestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries, Institute of Agriculture University of Tennessee Tennessee Knoxville USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8274-8025
Kezia R ManloveDepartment of Wildland Resources and Ecology Center Utah State University Utah Logan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7200-5236
Ryan S MillerCenter for Epidemiology and Animal Health United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Service Colorado Fort Collins USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3892-0251
Raoul BoughtonArchbold Biological Station Buck Island Ranch Florida Lake Placid USA.
James BeasleySavannah River Ecology Laboratory Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia South Carolina Aiken USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9707-3713
Joseph NorthrupWildlife Research and Monitoring Section Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Ontario Peterborough Canada.
Kurt C VerCauterenUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center Colorado Fort Collins USA.
George WittemyerDepartment of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology Colorado State University Colorado Fort Collins USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1640-5355
Kim PepinUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center Colorado Fort Collins USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9931-8312

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying spatiotemporally explicit interactions within animal populations facilitates the understanding of social structure and its relationship with ecological processes. Data from animal tracking technologies (Global Positioning Systems ["GPS"]) can circumvent longstanding challenges in the estimation of spatiotemporally explicit interactions, but the discrete nature and coarse temporal resolution of data mean that ephemeral interactions that occur between consecutive GPS locations go undetected. Here, we developed a method to quantify individual and spatial patterns of interaction using continuous-time movement models (CTMMs) fit to GPS tracking data. We first applied CTMMs to infer the full movement trajectories at an arbitrarily fine temporal scale before estimating interactions, thus allowing inference of interactions occurring between observed GPS locations. Our framework then infers indirect interactions-individuals occurring at the same location, but at different times-while allowing the identification of indirect interactions to vary with ecological context based on CTMM outputs. We assessed the performance of our new method using simulations and illustrated its implementation by deriving disease-relevant interaction networks for two behaviorally differentiated species, wild pigs (

Indexed as

African swine feverchronic wasting diseasecontinuous‐time movement modelsGlobal Positioning System (GPS)interactionsocial network

Identifiers

PMID36993145
PMCPMC10040956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.