ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
The perspectives of community members on COVID-19-related social stigma and mitigation strategies: A qualitative study in Madhya Pradesh, India.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The negative and positive: perceptions regarding COVID-19 pandemic among an online sample of adults; qualitative study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Case fatality among people with drug-susceptible TB enrolled in a private health sector TB treatment support program in Bihar, India during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Stigma is a well-documented impediment to health-seeking behaviors and treatment adherence. An explicit societal understanding is essential to halt the stigmatization. Studies documented COVID-19-associated stigma among healthcare personnel. However, there is little evidence regarding community perceptions and experiences of the stigma associated with COVID-2019. We described how various communities perceive and experience the stigma associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: We conducted a phenomenological study in three districts of Madhya Pradesh, with both urban and rural areas. We conducted 36 in-depth phone interviews. All the interviews were recorded, transcribed, and translated into English and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Two major themes were derived: 1) experiences of coronavirus disease 2019 recovered individuals and community members on discrimination and stigma, and 2) efforts to reduce coronavirus disease 2019-associated discrimination and stigma. Social support is critical in mitigating the adverse effects of stigma and thereby aiding in preventing disease spread. They express gratitude to the local government for moral support. Although activities involving information, education, and communication may be beneficial in reducing the stigma associated with COVID 2019, the mass media have a critical role. Conclusions: The multidisciplinary teams comprising medical, social, and behavioral scientists and communication and media experts should be formed to reduce the risk of ambiguous messages and misinformation related to COVID-19 at primary care at the community level. Furthermore, it is vital for anti-stigma orientation among community members via mass media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.