ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Prevalence and correlates of psychological distress among nurses in a teaching institute in South India.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Screening for Psychological distress and their Determinants among Clinical nurses in Tertiary Care Teaching Institution, India: A cross-sectional Survey.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nurses are constantly exposed to physical and mental stress due to the nature of their job. Estimating the prevalence and the factors associated with psychological distress among nurses is crucial to devise health promotion strategies. We conducted this study to determine the prevalence of psychological distress and its associated factors among nurses working in a teaching institute in Puducherry. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among 1217 nursing employees aged between 21 and 60 years from May 2019 to April 2020. We assessed psychological distress by using a self-administered general health questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12). Participants having a GHQ-12 score of ≥ 3 were considered to have psychological distress. Chi-squared test and adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) were used to determine the factors associated with psychological distress. Results: The response rate was 99% (1217/1229), and the majority 943 (77.5%) were women. The mean (SD) GHQ-12 score among nurses was 1.88 (2.6). More than one-fourth of nurses, that is, 27.2% (95% CI: 24.8-29.7) had psychological distress. Psychological distress was significantly higher among women (aPR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.14), those having less than ten years of work experience (aPR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.00-1.18), those with poor sleep quality (aPR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.22-1.35), and those having severe to dangerous level of workplace stress (aPR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.17-1.39). Conclusion: We report a high prevalence of psychological distress among nurses, especially among women, those having poor sleep quality, and those having severe to dangerous level of workplace stress. We highlight that reducing workplace stress and improving sleep hygiene can be vital in improving mental health status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.