Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36993081›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022

Adverse drug reactions reporting: Five years analysis from a teaching hospital.

Vaishali Thakare, Anant Patil, Mukta Jain, Vivek Rai, Deepak Langade

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vaishali ThakareDepartment of Pharmacology, Dr. DY Patil Medical College, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Anant PatilDepartment of Pharmacology, Dr. DY Patil Medical College, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Mukta JainDepartment of Pharmacology, Dr. DY Patil Medical College, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Vivek RaiDepartment of Pharmacology, Dr. DY Patil Medical College, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Deepak LangadeDepartment of Pharmacology, Dr. DY Patil Medical College, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre · INCreative Commons · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are important cause of morbidity and mortality. Despite its known importance, rate and quality (completeness score) of ADR reporting is not satisfactory. The objective of this study was to analyze pattern and completeness score of ADRs during past five-years. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, ADRs reported between 2017 to 2021 were analyzed according to year, gender, age-group, pharmacological class and department. The completeness score of ADRs was calculated. The number of sensitization programs conducted over 5 years and its impact on the completeness score was also evaluated. Results: A total of 104 ADRs were reported among 61 (58.6%) female and 43 (41.4%) male patients. Adults (18-65 years) comprised the most affected age group, accounting for 82 (79%) patients. Out of all, 35.5% ADRs were reported in 2018, whereas 27% were reported during 2021. Except during 2017, percentage of females with ADRs was more. Department of pulmonary medicine and dermatology contributed to maximum extent in ADR reporting. Antibiotics [23 (22.11%)], antitubercular drugs (AKT) [21 (20.19%)], and vaccines [13 (12.4%)] represented the most common agents with which ADRs were reported. ADR reporting was very low in 2017 (4/104). Percentage improvement in completeness score in 2021 vs. 2018 was 11.95% ( Conclusion: Incidence of ADRs was more common in females. AKT and antimicrobials are commonly implicated in ADRs. Increase in awareness of ADR reporting through sensitization programs can help to improve rate and quality of reporting.

Indexed as

Healthcare professionalspharmacovigilance activitiessafety reporting

Identifiers

PMID36993081
PMCPMC10041274
OpenAlexW4313209730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.