ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Intrapartum cardiotocographic monitoring and its correlation with neonatal outcome.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Intrapartum Cardiotocography Findings with Umbilical Arterial Blood Gas Parameters and Neonatal Outcomes in Non-Reassuring Fetal Status.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Outcome of Preterm Neonates > 32 Weeks Gestation in Relation to Three-Tiered Fetal Heart Rate Categorization.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Interobserver agreement: Individual CTG features show better agreement among investigators than the overall CTG assessment in cases of meconium-stained amniotic fluid.European journal of midwifery · 2025Article
- Evidence-based intrapartum care during vaginal births: Direct observations in a tertiary care hospital in Central Sri Lanka.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the advancements in perinatal care in past decades, perinatal asphyxia remains a serious problem leading to significant perinatal morbidity and mortality. Therefore, foetal monitoring during the intrapartum period is of paramount importance. Among various methods of fetal monitoring, cardiotocography is a form of electronic foetal monitoring in which there is simultaneous recording of foetal heart rate and uterine contractions. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was done in the labour room and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a teaching Municipal Hospital in North India including 500 pregnant women of age group 18-45 years with singeleton fetus of gestation ≥36 weeks without any known congenital anomaly. Intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) for 20 minutes was done within 12 hours prior to delivery and babies born to them were observed for birth asphyxia as Apgar score <7 at 1 minute as per using APGAR score less than 7 at 1 minute as per south east asia regional neonatal perinatal database (SEAR-NPD), world health organization (WHO) working definition. Results: CTG tracing was normal/reassuring in 92% of pregnant women, nonreassuring in 7% and was abnormal in only 1%. In patients with abnormal and nonreassuring CTG, delivery by lower segment cesarian section (LSCS) was significantly high ( Conclusion: Abnormal CTG tracings result in higher incidence of operative interventions for deliveries. Abnormal CTG pattern during intrapartum CTG has high specificity and negative predictive value but has low sensitivity and positive predictive value for detection of birth asphyxia and need for NICU admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.