Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36993024›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022

Stake holder perspectives on the role of accredited social health activists (ASHAs) in Indian public mental healthcare space: A qualitative study.

Prateek Varshney, Barikar C Malathesh, P L Nirisha, Nisha R Harshitha, Nithesh Kulal, Channaveerachari N Kumar, Gopi Gajera, Satish Suhas, Patley Rahul, H A Harshitha and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Prateek VarshneyDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Barikar C MalatheshDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Telangana, India.
P L NirishaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Nisha R HarshithaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Nithesh KulalDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Channaveerachari N KumarDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Gopi GajeraDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Satish SuhasDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Patley RahulDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
H A HarshithaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Narayana ManjunathaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Adarsha A ManjappaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Suresh B MathDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Jagadisha ThirthalliDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

Psychiatric research infrastructure for intervention and implementation in India – TEAMSD43TW009114 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Smita N Deshpande, Mary Elizabeth Hawk · 2014 to 2026
$3.2M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Community health workers such as Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) are existing resources who can facilitate the bridging of the mental health treatment gap. Knowing about the perspectives of ASHAs in delivering mental health care and other professionals with experience working in the area of community mental health is imperative. Method: As part of an implementation research project aimed at comparing the effectiveness of two training methods for community health workers (ASHAs), we conducted five focussed group discussions including four with ASHAs ( Results: ASHAs were willing to incorporate mental health identification (and referral) in their regular activities without additional perceived burden. ASHAs were easily able to identify severe mental disorders (SMDs). For substance use disorders (SUDs), due to factors such as normalization of substance consumption and stigma, there was a felt difficulty in the recognition by ASHAs. ASHAs' difficulty in identifying the CMDs was because of poor awareness in both those with mental illness and ASHAs. Incentivizing the work of ASHAs was thought to yield more returns. Conclusions: ASHAs have the potential to be excellent resources for easy screening, identification, and follow-up of those with mental health concerns in the community. Policies to involve them need to evolve.

Indexed as

Community health care workercommunity mental healthqualitative researchtask-sharingtask-shifting

Identifiers

PMID36993024
PMCPMC10041250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.