ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Microbiological profile and their antibiogram of bloodstream infections amongst first and second surge of the COVID-19 patients in a tertiary care hospital.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The world is experiencing a pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2. The prescription of a superfluity of unnecessary antibiotics without regard for the potential for increased antimicrobial resistances is extensive and unimpeded during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aims: To compare the microorganisms and the pattern of antimicrobial resistance of bacteremia during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care hospital. Methods and Material: This retrospective observational study, to compared the blood culture of the COVID-19 pandemic during the first wave (April 2020 to September 2020) and the second wave (April 2021 to September 2021). All the blood culture isolates were identified and the antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done according to standard guidelines. Results: Out of 1470 blood culture samples, 259 (17.6%) blood bacterial isolates were grown in the first wave and, out of 4200 blood culture samples, 711 (16.9%) bacterial isolated during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CONS) was 32.8% followed by Staphylococcus aureus 29.7% in COVID first wave and staphylococcus aureus (48.9%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.6%) during COVID second wave were the most prevalent isolates. Conclusions: This study shows that coagulase-negative staphylococcus aureus and multidrug-resistant Klebsiella spp. are the leading causes of bloodstream coagulase-negative infections during both the first and second wave in the bloodstream COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.