Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36992871›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023

Self-supervised denoising of Nyquist-sampled volumetric images via deep learning.

Matthew B Applegate, Kivanc Kose, Sandesh Ghimire, Milind Rajadhyaksha, Jennifer Dy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. PortableBiomedical optics express · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew B ApplegateNortheastern University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1430-1192
Kivanc KoseDermatology Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3185-2639
Sandesh GhimireNortheastern University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Milind RajadhyakshaDermatology Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6323-4547
Jennifer DyNortheastern University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Confocal video-mosaicking microscopy to guide surgery of superficially spreading skin cancersR01CA240771 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CAMPS, OCTAVIA IRMA, RAJADHYAKSHA, MILIND · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
Simultaneous coaxial widefield imaging and reflectance confocal microscopy for improved diagnosis of skin cancers in vivoR01EB028752 · NIBIB · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI CAMPS, OCTAVIA IRMA, DICKENSHEETS, DAVID LEE · 2020 to 2023
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240771NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Deep learning has demonstrated excellent performance enhancing noisy or degraded biomedical images. However, many of these models require access to a noise-free version of the images to provide supervision during training, which limits their utility. Here, we develop an algorithm (noise2Nyquist) that leverages the fact that Nyquist sampling provides guarantees about the maximum difference between adjacent slices in a volumetric image, which allows denoising to be performed without access to clean images. We aim to show that our method is more broadly applicable and more effective than other self-supervised denoising algorithms on real biomedical images, and provides comparable performance to algorithms that need clean images during training. Approach: We first provide a theoretical analysis of noise2Nyquist and an upper bound for denoising error based on sampling rate. We go on to demonstrate its effectiveness in denoising in a simulated example as well as real fluorescence confocal microscopy, computed tomography, and optical coherence tomography images. Results: We find that our method has better denoising performance than existing self-supervised methods and is applicable to datasets where clean versions are not available. Our method resulted in peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) within 1 dB and structural similarity (SSIM) index within 0.02 of supervised methods. On medical images, it outperforms existing self-supervised methods by an average of 3 dB in PSNR and 0.1 in SSIM. Conclusion: noise2Nyquist can be used to denoise any volumetric dataset sampled at at least the Nyquist rate making it useful for a wide variety of existing datasets.

Indexed as

deep learningdenoisingimage enhancementself-supervision

Identifiers

PMID36992871
PMCPMC10042483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.