ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023
Self-supervised denoising of Nyquist-sampled volumetric images via deep learning.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Domain Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Graph Convolution for Low-Dose Computed Tomography Reconstruction.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- PortableBiomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Deep learning has demonstrated excellent performance enhancing noisy or degraded biomedical images. However, many of these models require access to a noise-free version of the images to provide supervision during training, which limits their utility. Here, we develop an algorithm (noise2Nyquist) that leverages the fact that Nyquist sampling provides guarantees about the maximum difference between adjacent slices in a volumetric image, which allows denoising to be performed without access to clean images. We aim to show that our method is more broadly applicable and more effective than other self-supervised denoising algorithms on real biomedical images, and provides comparable performance to algorithms that need clean images during training. Approach: We first provide a theoretical analysis of noise2Nyquist and an upper bound for denoising error based on sampling rate. We go on to demonstrate its effectiveness in denoising in a simulated example as well as real fluorescence confocal microscopy, computed tomography, and optical coherence tomography images. Results: We find that our method has better denoising performance than existing self-supervised methods and is applicable to datasets where clean versions are not available. Our method resulted in peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) within 1 dB and structural similarity (SSIM) index within 0.02 of supervised methods. On medical images, it outperforms existing self-supervised methods by an average of 3 dB in PSNR and 0.1 in SSIM. Conclusion: noise2Nyquist can be used to denoise any volumetric dataset sampled at at least the Nyquist rate making it useful for a wide variety of existing datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.