Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36992798›Full record

ReviewSurgery open science2023

Management of small bowel obstruction and systematic review of treatment without nasogastric tube decompression.

Kyle D Klingbeil, James X Wu, Antonia Osuna-Garcia, Edward H Livingston

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgery open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06262815 (The Utility of Treatment With Nasogastric Tube Placement for Small Bowel Obstruction in Adult Patients in the Emergency Department; an Observational Multicenter Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06262815 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Utility of Treatment With Nasogastric Tube Placement for Small Bowel Obstruction in Adult Patients in the Emergency Department; an Observational Multicenter Study

TypeobservationalSponsorDaniel WilhelmsRan2024 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsSmall Bowel Obstruction, Frailty, Nasogastric TubeArmsNasogastric tube placement, Clinical Frailty Scale
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Is routine nasogastric decompression necessary following emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer?Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. European society for trauma and emergency surgery member-identified research priorities in emergency surgery: a roadmap for future clinical research opportunities.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyle D KlingbeilDepartment of Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine, United States of America.
James X WuDepartment of Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine, United States of America.
Antonia Osuna-GarciaUCLA Biomedical Library (Louise M. Darling), United States of America.
Edward H LivingstonDepartment of Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine, United States of America.
UCLA Medical Center · USAssociation of Research Libraries · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is common and its management has evolved in recent years. Study design: The literature describing adhesive small bowel obstruction (aSBO) treatment was reviewed, and a formal systematic review was performed to identify publications reporting results of aSBO treatment without NGTs. Results: The annual rate of hospital admission for SBO in the US has increased, with 340,100 admissions in 2019 alone. SBO is usually treated with bowel rest, intravenous hydration and NGT placement. In recent years, water soluble contrast (WSC) has been used as a cathartic to simulate bowel function and may reduce hospital length of stay (HLOS) by 1.95 days (95%CI 0.56-3.3). There were 3 articles of the initial 1650 screened that reported outcomes of SBO treatment without NGTs. These articles included 759 patients, of whom 272 (36%) with aSBO were managed successfully without NGTs. When comparing outcomes to patients who did receive NGT decompression, there were no significant differences in operative rates (28.6% v 16.5%, risk ratio 1.34, 95% CI 1.0, 1.8). Mortality and rates of bowel resection were also not affected by NGT decompression (risk ratio 1.98, 95% CI 0.43, 9.10 and risk ratio 1.56, 95% CI 0.92, 2.65, respectively). Conclusion: SBO is a common disease process with increasing annual incidence. Use of WSC stimulates the bowel and may reduce HLOS. Modern aSBO treatment protocols should include NGT decompression with consideration of WSC administration. Selection of patients for treatment without NGT decompression requires further investigation.

Indexed as

DecompressionIntestinal obstructionNasoenteric tubeNasogastric tubeSmall bowel obstructionSurgicalWater soluble contrast

Identifiers

PMID36992798
PMCPMC10040372
OpenAlexW4308411487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.