ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
Test-retest reliability of high-resolution surface electromyographic activities of facial muscles during facial expressions in healthy adults: A prospective observational study.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bilateral muscle activation in postparalytic facial synkinesis: a cross-sectional high-resolution surface electromyography study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Synchronous surface electromyography as objective method to evaluate the outcome of a biofeedback training in patients with facial synkinesis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Wireless high-resolution surface facial electromyography mask for discrimination of standardized facial expressions in healthy adults.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- High-resolution surface electromyographic activities of facial muscles during the six basic emotional expressions in healthy adults: a prospective observational study.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Surface electromyography (sEMG) is a standard method for psycho-physiological research to evaluate emotional expressions or in a clinical setting to analyze facial muscle function. High-resolution sEMG shows the best results to discriminate between different facial expressions. Nevertheless, the test-retest reliability of high-resolution facial sEMG is not analyzed in detail yet, as good reliability is a necessary prerequisite for its repeated clinical application. Methods: Thirty-six healthy adult participants (53% female, 18-67 years) were included. Electromyograms were recorded from both sides of the face using an arrangement of electrodes oriented by the underlying topography of the facial muscles (Fridlund scheme) and simultaneously by a geometric and symmetrical arrangement on the face (Kuramoto scheme). In one session, participants performed three trials of a standard set of different facial expression tasks. On one day, two sessions were performed. The two sessions were repeated two weeks later. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation statistics were used to analyze the intra-session, intra-day, and between-day reliability. Results: Fridlund scheme, mean ICCs per electrode position: Intra-session: excellent (0.935-0.994), intra-day: moderate to good (0.674-0.881), between-day: poor to moderate (0.095-0.730). Mean ICC's per facial expression: Intra-session: excellent (0.933-0.991), intra-day: good to moderate (0.674-0.903), between-day: poor to moderate (0.385-0.679). Kuramoto scheme, mean ICC's per electrode position: Intra-session: excellent (0.957-0.970), intra-day: good (0.751-0.908), between-day: moderate (0.643-0.742). Mean ICC's per facial expression: Intra-session: excellent (0.927-0.991), intra-day: good to excellent (0.762-0.973), between-day: poor to good (0.235-0.868). The intra-session reliability of both schemes were equal. Compared to the Fridlund scheme, the ICCs for intra-day and between-day reliability were always better for the Kuramoto scheme. Conclusion: For repeated facial sEMG measurements of facial expressions, we recommend the Kuramoto scheme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.