Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36992515›Full record

ArticleViruses2023

Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs.

Emily C Sanders, Alicia M Santos, Eugene K Nguyen, Aidan A Gelston, Sudipta Majumdar, Gregory A Weiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily C SandersDepartments of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1043-5772
Alicia M SantosDepartments of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0887-2140
Eugene K NguyenDepartments of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7684-9930
Aidan A GelstonDepartments of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7162-289X
Sudipta MajumdarDepartments of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6738-2267
Gregory A WeissDepartments of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0296-9846

Funding

MARC U*STAR at the University of California, IrvineT34GM069337 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BUCHMEIER, MICHAEL JOSEPH, DE LA CRUZ, MARLENE · 2005 to 2019
$8.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T34 GM069337NIH HHS GM-69337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sandwich format immunoassay is generally more sensitive and specific than more common assay formats, including direct, indirect, or competitive. A sandwich assay, however, requires two receptors to bind non-competitively to the target analyte. Typically, pairs of antibodies (Abs) or antibody fragments (Fabs) that are capable of forming a sandwiching with the target are identified through a slow, guess-and-check method with panels of candidate binding partners. Additionally, sandwich assays that are reliant on commercial antibodies can suffer from changes to reagent quality outside the researchers' control. This report presents a reimagined and simplified phage display selection protocol that directly identifies sandwich binding peptides and Fabs. The approach yielded two sandwich pairs, one peptide-peptide and one Fab-peptide sandwich for the cancer and Parkinson's disease biomarker DJ-1. Requiring just a few weeks to identify, the sandwich pairs delivered apparent affinity that is comparable to other commercial peptide and antibody sandwiches. The results reported here could expand the availability of sandwich binding partners for a wide range of clinical biomarker assays.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesPeptide LibraryAntibodiesBiomarkersEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayPeptidesAntibodiesBiomarkersPeptide LibraryPeptidesbiomarker diagnosticsenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)phage displaysandwich binding

Identifiers

PMID36992515
PMCPMC10057555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.