Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36992430›Full record

ReviewViruses2023

The Future of Clinical Phage Therapy in the United Kingdom.

Joshua D Jones, Clare Trippett, Mehrunisha Suleman, Martha R J Clokie, Jason R Clark

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Bacteriophage Therapy AgainstMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Antimicrobial Resistance: The Answers.British journal of biomedical science · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. OvercomingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. New BacteriophageViruses · 2025
    Article
  15. Human Gut Bacteriophageome: Insights Into Drug Resistance Mechanisms in Tuberculosis.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua D JonesUK Phage Therapy, 272 Bath Street, Glasgow G2 4JR, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0981-1913
Clare TrippettCPI, 1 Union Square, Central Park, Darlington DL1 1GL, UK.
Mehrunisha SulemanThe Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.
Martha R J ClokieDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Jason R ClarkFixed Phage, West of Scotland Science Park, Block 2, Kelvin Campus, 2317 Maryhill Road, Glasgow G20 0SP, UK.
University of Leicester · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_18046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophage (phage) therapy is a promising alternative antimicrobial strategy with the potential to transform the way bacterial infections are treated. In the United Kingdom, phages are classed as a biological medicine. Although no phages are licensed for UK use, they may be used as unlicensed medicinal products where licensed alternatives cannot meet a patient's clinical needs. In the last 2 years, 12 patients in the UK have received phage therapy, and there is burgeoning clinical interest. Currently, clinical phage provision in the UK is ad hoc and relies upon networking with international sources of phages. The provision of phage therapy in the UK will not progress beyond an increasing number of ad hoc cases until an onshore sustainable and scalable source of well-characterised phages manufactured in accordance with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) is established. Here, we present an exciting new collaboration between UK Phage Therapy, the Centre for Phage Research at University of Leicester, CPI, and Fixed Phage. These partners, and others as we develop, will establish sustainable, scalable, and equitable phage therapy provision in the UK. We set out a vision for how phage therapy will be integrated into the NHS and healthcare more broadly, including the complementarity between licensed (cocktail) and unlicensed (personalised) phage preparations. Key elements of phage therapy infrastructure in the UK will be GMP phage manufacturing, a national phage library, and a national clinical phage centre. Together, this infrastructure will support NHS microbiology departments to develop and oversee phage therapy provision across the UK. As it will take time to deliver this, we also describe considerations for clinicians seeking to use unlicensed phage therapy in the interim. In summary, this review sets out a roadmap for the delivery of clinical phage therapy to the UK, the benefits of which we hope will reverberate for patients for decades to come.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsBacteriophagesPhage TherapyHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsUnited KingdomPharmaceutical Preparationsbacteriophagephage therapyUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID36992430
PMCPMC10053292
OpenAlexW4323863341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.