Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36992158›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Is SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination of Subjects with a Prior History of Allergies Dangerous? Experiences in the Veneto Region of Italy.

Silvia Cocchio, Gloria Girolametto, Alice Pierobon, Patrizia Furlan, Emanuela Destefani, Lorenzo Bulegato, Antonio Stano, Silvia Fietta, Annachiara Poletto, Vincenzo Baldo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia CocchioDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Via Loredan 18, 35100 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3801-0901
Gloria GirolamettoDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Via Loredan 18, 35100 Padova, Italy.
Alice PierobonDepartment of Prevention of Local Health Unit n. 7, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, Italy.
Patrizia FurlanDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Via Loredan 18, 35100 Padova, Italy.
Emanuela DestefaniDepartment of Prevention of Local Health Unit n. 7, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, Italy.
Lorenzo BulegatoDepartment of Prevention of Local Health Unit n. 7, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, Italy.
Antonio StanoDepartment of Prevention of Local Health Unit n. 7, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, Italy.
Silvia FiettaDepartment of Prevention of Local Health Unit n. 7, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, Italy.
Annachiara PolettoDepartment of Prevention of Local Health Unit n. 7, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, Italy.
Vincenzo BaldoDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Via Loredan 18, 35100 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6012-9453
Ospedale San Bassiano · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adverse events after SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations have caused alarm to some individuals with previously diagnosed allergies. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the risk of adverse reactions was actually higher in this subgroup. To this end, we carried out an observational descriptive analysis of vaccines administered in a "protected setting" in the Veneto region of Italy between December 2020 and December 2022. Reactions were classified using systemic organic classification (SOC), and their severity was assessed using the criteria of the Italian Drug Agency (AIFA). A total of 421 subjects were vaccinated with 1050 doses, 95.0% of which were administered without adverse events. In all, 53 subjects reported 87 SOC reactions (1.6 reactions/person), and 18.3% of these reactions were severe. One person was hospitalized, but all subjects enjoyed complete remission. Reporting rates were 9.0%, 3.1%, and 1.2% for first, second, and third doses, respectively. The most frequent reactions involved the respiratory system (2.3%), the cutaneous and subcutaneous systems (2.1%), and the nervous system (1.7%). Multivariate analyses (adjOR (95% CI)) revealed that the probability of experiencing at least one reaction significantly declined with increases in age [0.95 (0.94-0.97)] and in the number of doses received, i.e., 75% [0.25 (0.13-0.49)] for second doses and 88% [0.12 (0.04-0.39)] for third doses. These results indicated that vaccinations could be safely administered; few reactions were reported, and there were no permanent adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

allergiesSARS-CoV-2vaccination

Identifiers

PMID36992158
PMCPMC10052958
OpenAlexW4322774922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.