Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36992141›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Increasing Influenza Vaccination in Primary Healthcare Workers Using Solidary Incentives: Analysis of Efficacy and Costs.

Christian Bengoa Terrero, Marian Bas Villalobos, Ana Pastor Rodríguez-Moñino, María Dolores Lasheras Carbajo, Julián Pérez-Villacastín, Cristina Fernández Pérez, María Jesús García Torrent, Rafael Sánchez-Del-Hoyo, Alberto García Lledó

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christian Bengoa TerreroServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0566-8582
Marian Bas VillalobosServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1275-0215
Ana Pastor Rodríguez-MoñinoGerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, 28035 Madrid, Spain.
María Dolores Lasheras CarbajoDirección General de Salud Pública, Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, 28009 Madrid, Spain.
Julián Pérez-VillacastínServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Fernández PérezInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico, Universitario de Santiago, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
María Jesús García TorrentDepartamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5264-608X
Rafael Sánchez-Del-HoyoUnidad de Apoyo Metodológico a la Investigación, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Alberto García LledóServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, 28805 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8986-2584

Funding

Fundación Interhospitalaria para la Investigación Cardiovascular N/ASanofi (Spain) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInfluenza vaccination campaigns have difficulty in reaching the 75% uptake in healthcare workers (HCWs) that public health organizations target. This study runs a campaign across 42 primary care centers (PCCs) where for every HCW vaccinated against influenza, a polio vaccine is donated through UNICEF for children in developing nations. It also analyses the efficacy and cost of the campaign.

methodThis observational prospective non-randomized cohort study was conducted across 262 PCCs and 15.812 HCWs. A total of 42 PCCs were delivered the full campaign, 114 were used as the control group, and 106 were excluded. The vaccine uptake in HCWs within each of those PCCs was registered. The cost analysis assumes that campaign costs remain stable year to year, and the only added cost would be the polio vaccines (0.59€).

resultsWe found statistically significant differences between both groups. A total of 1423 (59.02%) HCWs got vaccinated in the intervention group and 3768 (55.76%) in the control group OR 1.14, CI 95% (1.04-1.26). In this scenario, each additional HCW vaccinated in the intervention group costs 10.67€. Assuming all 262 PCCs had joined the campaign and reached 59.02% uptake, the cost of running this incentive would have been 5506€. The potential cost of increasing uptake in HCWs by 1% across all PCC (n = 8816) would be 1683€, and across all healthcare providers, 8862€ (n = 83.226).

conclusionsThis study reveals that influenza vaccination uptake can be innovative by including solidary incentives and be successful in increasing uptake in HCWs. The cost of running a campaign such as this one is low.

Indexed as

costshealthcare workersincentivesinfluenzauptake

Identifiers

PMID36992141
PMCPMC10057627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.