Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36992103›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Evaluation of the Association of Recombinant Proteins NanH and PknG from

Nicole Ramos Scholl, Mara Thais de Oliveira Silva, Tallyson Nogueira Barbosa, Rodrigo Barros de Pinho, Mirna Samara Dié Alves, Ricardo Wagner Portela, Vasco Ariston de Carvalho Azevedo, Sibele Borsuk

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole Ramos SchollLaboratório de Biotecnologia Infecto-Parasitária, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Biotecnologia, UFPel, Pelotas 96010-900, RS, Brazil.
Mara Thais de Oliveira SilvaLaboratório de Biotecnologia Infecto-Parasitária, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Biotecnologia, UFPel, Pelotas 96010-900, RS, Brazil.
Tallyson Nogueira BarbosaLaboratório de Biotecnologia Infecto-Parasitária, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Biotecnologia, UFPel, Pelotas 96010-900, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4502-4220
Rodrigo Barros de PinhoLaboratório de Biotecnologia Infecto-Parasitária, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Biotecnologia, UFPel, Pelotas 96010-900, RS, Brazil.
Mirna Samara Dié AlvesLaboratório de Biotecnologia Infecto-Parasitária, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Biotecnologia, UFPel, Pelotas 96010-900, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0754-3721
Ricardo Wagner PortelaLaboratório de Imunologia e Biologia Molecular, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, UFBA, Salvador 40110-100, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9095-776X
Vasco Ariston de Carvalho AzevedoLaboratório de Genética Celular e Molecular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, UFMG, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4775-2280
Sibele BorsukLaboratório de Biotecnologia Infecto-Parasitária, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Biotecnologia, UFPel, Pelotas 96010-900, RS, Brazil.
Instituto de Saúde · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caseous lymphadenitis is a chronic contagious disease that causes economic losses worldwide. Treatments are ineffective, thus demonstrating the importance of vaccination. In this study, rNanH and rPknG proteins from

Indexed as

aluminum hydroxideantibodiesassociated antigenscaseous lymphadenitissaponinsubunit vaccine

Identifiers

PMID36992103
PMCPMC10051533
OpenAlexW4321597182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.