Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36992055›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Trusted Autonomous Operations of Distributed Satellite Systems Using Optical Sensors.

Kathiravan Thangavel, Dario Spiller, Roberto Sabatini, Stefania Amici, Nicolas Longepe, Pablo Servidia, Pier Marzocca, Haytham Fayek, Luigi Ansalone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
21.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Kathiravan ThangavelSir Lawrence Wackett Defence & Aerospace Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3401-9493
Dario SpillerSchool of Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00138 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6877-3187
Roberto SabatiniDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 127788, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-3399-2291
Stefania AmiciNational Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology (INGV), 00143 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2410-646X
Nicolas LongepeΦ-Lab Explore Office, ESRIN, European Space Agency, 00044 Frascati, Italy.
Pablo ServidiaComisión Nacional de Actividades Espaciales (CONAE), Av. Paseo Colón 751, Buenos Aires C1063ACH, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-8436-0622
Pier MarzoccaSir Lawrence Wackett Defence & Aerospace Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6058-9094
Haytham FayekSchool of Computing Technologies, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.
Luigi AnsaloneEngineering and Future Space Systems Unit, Italian Space Agency, 00198 Rome, Italy.
RMIT University · AUAgenzia Spaziale Italiana · ITEuropean Space Research Institute · ITIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia · ITKhalifa University of Science and Technology · AENational Space Activities Commission · AR

Funding

SmartSat Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) 2.13s
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent developments in Distributed Satellite Systems (DSS) have undoubtedly increased mission value due to the ability to reconfigure the spacecraft cluster/formation and incrementally add new or update older satellites in the formation. These features provide inherent benefits, such as increased mission effectiveness, multi-mission capabilities, design flexibility, and so on. Trusted Autonomous Satellite Operation (TASO) are possible owing to the predictive and reactive integrity features offered by Artificial Intelligence (AI), including both on-board satellites and in the ground control segments. To effectively monitor and manage time-critical events such as disaster relief missions, the DSS must be able to reconfigure autonomously. To achieve TASO, the DSS should have reconfiguration capability within the architecture and spacecraft should communicate with each other through an Inter-Satellite Link (ISL). Recent advances in AI, sensing, and computing technologies have resulted in the development of new promising concepts for the safe and efficient operation of the DSS. The combination of these technologies enables trusted autonomy in intelligent DSS (iDSS) operations, allowing for a more responsive and resilient approach to Space Mission Management (SMM) in terms of data collection and processing, especially when using state-of-the-art optical sensors. This research looks into the potential applications of iDSS by proposing a constellation of satellites in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) for near-real-time wildfire management. For spacecraft to continuously monitor Areas of Interest (AOI) in a dynamically changing environment, satellite missions must have extensive coverage, revisit intervals, and reconfiguration capability that iDSS can offer. Our recent work demonstrated the feasibility of AI-based data processing using state-of-the-art on-board astrionics hardware accelerators. Based on these initial results, AI-based software has been successively developed for wildfire detection on-board iDSS satellites. To demonstrate the applicability of the proposed iDSS architecture, simulation case studies are performed considering different geographic locations.

Indexed as

astrionicsbushfiredisaster managementdistributed satellite systems (DSSs)edge computinghyperspectral imageryintelligent DSS (iDSS)mission managementoptical sensorsPRISMAtrusted autonomous satellite operations (TASO)wildfire

Identifiers

PMID36992055
PMCPMC10052948
OpenAlexW4353072268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.