Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36991870›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The r'-Wave Algorithm: A New Diagnostic Tool to Predict the Diagnosis of Brugada Syndrome after a Sodium Channel Blocker Provocation Test.

Giampaolo Vetta, Antonio Parlavecchio, Lorenzo Pistelli, Paolo Desalvo, Armando Lo Savio, Michele Magnocavallo, Rodolfo Caminiti, Anna Tribuzio, Alessandro Vairo, Diego La Maestra and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Giampaolo VettaCardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1120-0492
Antonio ParlavecchioCardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7122-6053
Lorenzo PistelliCardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Paolo DesalvoCardiology Unit, Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Hospital S. Croce e Carle, 12100 Cuneo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0762-791X
Armando Lo SavioCardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Michele MagnocavalloCardiology Division, Arrhythmology Unit, S. Giovanni Calibita Hospital, Isola Tiberina, 00186 Rome, Italy.
Rodolfo CaminitiCardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Anna TribuzioDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Alessandro VairoDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8848-3198
Diego La MaestraCardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Francesco VettaFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, 00131 Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe DattiloCardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Francesco LuzzaCardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Gianluca Di BellaCardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Roberta RossiniCardiology Unit, Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Hospital S. Croce e Carle, 12100 Cuneo, Italy.
Domenico Giovanni Della RoccaHeart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Pasquale CreaCardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
University of Messina · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITFatebenefratelli Hospital · ITSaint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences · ITVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A diagnosis of Brugada syndrome (BrS) is based on the presence of a type 1 electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern, either spontaneously or after a Sodium Channel Blocker Provocation Test (SCBPT). Several ECG criteria have been evaluated as predictors of a positive SCBPT, such as the β-angle, the α-angle, the duration of the base of the triangle at 5 mm from the r'-wave (DBT- 5 mm), the duration of the base of the triangle at the isoelectric line (DBT- iso), and the triangle base/height ratio. The aim of our study was to test all previously proposed ECG criteria in a large cohort study and to evaluate an r'-wave algorithm for predicting a BrS diagnosis after an SCBPT. We enrolled all patients who consecutively underwent SCBPT using flecainide from January 2010 to December 2015 in the test cohort and from January 2016 to December 2021 in the validation cohort. We included the ECG criteria with the best diagnostic accuracy in relation to the test cohort in the development of the r'-wave algorithm (β-angle, α-angle, DBT- 5 mm, and DBT- iso.) Of the total of 395 patients enrolled, 72.4% were male and the average age was 44.7 ± 13.5 years. Following the SCBPTs, 24.1% of patients (n = 95) were positive and 75.9% (n = 300) were negative. ROC analysis of the validation cohort showed that the AUC of the r'-wave algorithm (AUC: 0.92; CI 0.85-0.99) was significantly better than the AUC of the β-angle (AUC: 0.82; 95% CI 0.71-0.92), the α-angle (AUC: 0.77; 95% CI 0.66-0.90), the DBT- 5 mm (AUC: 0.75; 95% CI 0.64-0.87), the DBT- iso (AUC: 0.79; 95% CI 0.67-0.91), and the triangle base/height (AUC: 0.61; 95% CI 0.48-0.75) (

Indexed as

Brugada SyndromeAdultAlgorithmsCohort StudiesElectrocardiographyFemaleFlecainideHumansMaleMiddle AgedSodium Channel BlockersFlecainideSodium Channel BlockersBrugada syndromeelectrocardiogramr’-waver’-wave algorithmα-angleβ-angle

Identifiers

PMID36991870
PMCPMC10056571
OpenAlexW4327618763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.