Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36991678›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Beam-Selection for 5G/B5G Networks Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study.

Efstratios Chatzoglou, Sotirios K Goudos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Efstratios ChatzoglouDepartment of Computer Science, Hellenic Open University, Aristotelous 18, 26335 Patra, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6507-5052
Sotirios K GoudosELEDIA@AUTH, Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5981-5683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A challenging problem in millimeter wave (mmWave) communications for the fifth generation of cellular communications and beyond (5G/B5G) is the beam selection problem. This is due to severe attenuation and penetration losses that are inherent in the mmWave band. Thus, the beam selection problem for mmWave links in a vehicular scenario can be solved as an exhaustive search among all candidate beam pairs. However, this approach cannot be assuredly completed within short contact times. On the other hand, machine learning (ML) has the potential to significantly advance 5G/B5G technology, as evidenced by the growing complexity of constructing cellular networks. In this work, we perform a comparative study of using different ML methods to solve the beam selection problem. We use a common dataset for this scenario found in the literature. We increase the accuracy of these results by approximately 30%. Moreover, we extend the given dataset by producing additional synthetic data. We apply ensemble learning techniques and obtain results with about 94% accuracy. The novelty of our work lies in the fact that we improve the existing dataset by adding more synthetic data and by designing a custom ensemble learning method for the problem at hand.

Indexed as

5GB5Gbeam selectionclassificationdeep learningensemble learningmachine learningMIMOV2IV2X

Identifiers

PMID36991678
PMCPMC10058871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.