ArticleBMC medical genomics2023
Bioinformatics screening of colorectal-cancer causing molecular signatures through gene expression profiles to discover therapeutic targets and candidate agents.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Manzamine A: A promising marine-derived cancer therapeutic for multi-targeted interactions with E2F8, SIX1, AR, GSK-3β, and V-ATPase - A systematic review.European journal of pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Guanylate cyclase-C Signaling Axis as a theragnostic target in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Manzamine-A: Unraveling the Chemical and Biological Tapestry of a Marine-Derived Drug Lead.Marine drugs · 2026Review
- Genetic underpinnings of type-2 diabetes (T2D) with colorectal cancer (CRC): In-silico discovery of common molecular signatures, pathogenetic processes and therapeutic candidates.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Decision tree-based machine learning methods for identifying colorectal cancer-associated microRNA signatures and their regulatory networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics identification of key microRNA-correlated genes associated with hepatocellular carcinoma heterogeneity and prognosis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Network-Based Integrative Analysis to Identify Key Genes and Corresponding Reporter Biomolecules for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Comprehensive identification of hub mRNAs and lncRNAs in colorectal cancer using galaxy: an in silico transcriptome analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Screening of common genomic biomarkers to explore common drugs for the treatment of pancreatic and kidney cancers with type-2 diabetes through bioinformatics analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The gut virome and human health: From diversity to personalized medicine.Engineering microbiology · 2025Review
- Identification of potential biomarkers for lung cancer using integrated bioinformatics and machine learning approaches.PloS one · 2025Article
- Integrative machine learning and bioinformatics analysis to identify cellular senescence-related genes and potential therapeutic targets in ulcerative colitis and colorectal cancer.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- New treatment alternatives for primary and metastatic colorectal cancer by an integrated transcriptome and network analyses.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advances in Precision Medicine Approaches for Colorectal Cancer: From Molecular Profiling to Targeted Therapies.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Review
- The Expression of the Claudin Family of Proteins in Colorectal Cancer.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Host Transcriptional Regulatory Genes and Microbiome Networks Crosstalk through Immune Receptors Establishing Normal and Tumor Multiomics Metafirm of the Oral-Gut-Lung Axis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Red Kale (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDetection of appropriate receptor proteins and drug agents are equally important in the case of drug discovery and development for any disease. In this study, an attempt was made to explore colorectal cancer (CRC) causing molecular signatures as receptors and drug agents as inhibitors by using integrated statistics and bioinformatics approaches.
methodsTo identify the important genes that are involved in the initiation and progression of CRC, four microarray datasets (GSE9348, GSE110224, GSE23878, and GSE35279) and an RNA_Seq profiles (GSE50760) were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. The datasets were analyzed by a statistical r-package of LIMMA to identify common differentially expressed genes (cDEGs). The key genes (KGs) of cDEGs were detected by using the five topological measures in the protein-protein interaction network analysis. Then we performed in-silico validation for CRC-causing KGs by using different web-tools and independent databases. We also disclosed the transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory factors of KGs by interaction network analysis of KGs with transcription factors (TFs) and micro-RNAs. Finally, we suggested our proposed KGs-guided computationally more effective candidate drug molecules compared to other published drugs by cross-validation with the state-of-the-art alternatives of top-ranked independent receptor proteins.
resultsWe identified 50 common differentially expressed genes (cDEGs) from five gene expression profile datasets, where 31 cDEGs were downregulated, and the rest 19 were up-regulated. Then we identified 11 cDEGs (CXCL8, CEMIP, MMP7, CA4, ADH1C, GUCA2A, GUCA2B, ZG16, CLCA4, MS4A12 and CLDN1) as the KGs. Different pertinent bioinformatic analyses (box plot, survival probability curves, DNA methylation, correlation with immune infiltration levels, diseases-KGs interaction, GO and KEGG pathways) based on independent databases directly or indirectly showed that these KGs are significantly associated with CRC progression. We also detected four TFs proteins (FOXC1, YY1, GATA2 and NFKB) and eight microRNAs (hsa-mir-16-5p, hsa-mir-195-5p, hsa-mir-203a-3p, hsa-mir-34a-5p, hsa-mir-107, hsa-mir-27a-3p, hsa-mir-429, and hsa-mir-335-5p) as the key transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulators of KGs. Finally, our proposed 15 molecular signatures including 11 KGs and 4 key TFs-proteins guided 9 small molecules (Cyclosporin A, Manzamine A, Cardidigin, Staurosporine, Benzo[A]Pyrene, Sitosterol, Nocardiopsis Sp, Troglitazone, and Riccardin D) were recommended as the top-ranked candidate therapeutic agents for the treatment against CRC.
conclusionThe findings of this study recommended that our proposed target proteins and agents might be considered as the potential diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic signatures for CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.