Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36991409›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Treatment strategies for recurrent dislocation following total hip arthroplasty: relationship between cause of dislocation and type of revision surgery.

Takashi Toyoda, Kenichi Oe, Hirokazu Iida, Tomohisa Nakamura, Naofumi Okamoto, Takanori Saito

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takashi ToyodaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, 573-1010, Osaka, Japan.
Kenichi OeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, 573-1010, Osaka, Japan. oeken@hirakata.kmu.ac.jp.
Hirokazu IidaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, 573-1010, Osaka, Japan.
Tomohisa NakamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, 573-1010, Osaka, Japan.
Naofumi OkamotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, 573-1010, Osaka, Japan.
Takanori SaitoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, 573-1010, Osaka, Japan.
Kansai Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are many therapeutic options for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of revision surgery for dislocated hips.

methodsBetween November 2001 and December 2020, 71 consecutive revision hip surgeries were performed at our institution for recurrent dislocation following THA. We conducted a retrospective study of all 65 patients (71 hips), who were followed for a mean of 4.7 ± 3.2 years (range, 1-14). The cohort included 48 women and 17 men, with a mean age of 71 ± 12.3 years (range, 34-92). The mean number of previous surgeries was 1.6 ± 1.1 (range, 1-5). From intraoperative findings, we created six categories of revision hip surgery for recurrent dislocation following THA: open reduction and internal fixation (2 hips); head change or liner change only (6 hips); cup change with increased head size only (14 hips); stem change only (7 hips); cup and stem change (24 hips); and conversion to constrained cup (18 hips). Prosthesis survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, with repeat revision surgery for re-dislocation or implant failure as the endpoint. A cox proportional hazards model was used for risk factors of re-revision surgery.

resultsRe-dislocation occurred in 5 hips (7.0%) and implant failure in 1 hip (1.4%). The 10-year survival rate was 81.1% (95% confidence interval, 65.5-96.8). A Dorr classification of "positional" was a risk factor for re-revision surgery due to re-dislocation.

conclusionClear understanding of the cause of dislocation is essential for optimizing revision procedures and improving the rate of successful outcomes.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip DislocationHip ProsthesisJoint DislocationsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsCementConstrained cupDislocationRevisionTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID36991409
PMCPMC10053790
OpenAlexW4361201357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.