Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36991382›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2023

Role of cortical excitatory/inhibitory imbalance in autism spectrum disorders from a symptom severity trajectories framework: a study protocol.

Laura Colomar, Antonia San José Cáceres, Juan Álvarez-Linera, Javier González-Peñas, Abigail Huertas Patón, Daniel Martín de Blas, Ana Paloma Polo Arrondo, Andrea Solís, Emily Jones, Mara Parellada

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. GABAFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura ColomarInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain. lcolomar@ucm.es.
Antonia San José CáceresInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.
Juan Álvarez-LineraRadiology Department, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain.
Javier González-PeñasInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.
Abigail Huertas PatónDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Daniel Martín de BlasInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.
Ana Paloma Polo ArrondoNeurophysiology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Andrea SolísInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.
Emily JonesCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, University of London, Birkbeck, London, UK.
Mara ParelladaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESBirkbeck, University of London · GBHospital Ruber Internacional · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is considerable evidence reporting an excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) cortical imbalance in autism spectrum disorders (ASD). However, previous findings on the direction of this imbalance and its relationship to ASD symptomatology are heterogeneous. Some factors contributing to these mixed results might be the methodological differences between studies assessing the E/I ratio and the intrinsic variability within the autistic spectrum. Studying the evolution of ASD symptoms and the factors that modulate it might help to explain and reduce this variability. Here we present a study protocol to explore the longitudinal role of E/I imbalance in ASD symptoms, combining different approaches to measure the E/I ratio and using the trajectories of symptom severity as a framework.

methodsThis observational two time-point prospective study assesses the E/I ratio and the evolution of the behavioural symptoms in a sample of at least 98 participants with ASD. Participants are enrolled at 12 to 72 months of age and followed from 18 to 48 months after. A comprehensive battery of tests is applied to evaluate ASD clinical symptoms. The E/I ratio is approached from electrophysiology, magnetic resonance, and genetics. We will calculate the individual change for the main ASD symptoms and, based on that, we will define the trajectories of symptom severity. Then, we will investigate the correlation between measures of excitation/inhibition balance and autistic symptomatology cross-sectionally, as well as the ability of these measurements to predict changes in symptoms over time. DISCUSSION: This study presents a robust multisystemic approach to the E/I imbalance theory in autism and its relation to divergent symptom trajectories. That setting will allow us to relate and compare the neurobiological information coming from different sources and its impact on behavioural symptoms while accounting for the high variability in ASD. The findings derived from this study could contribute to the ASD biomarkers research and might provide valuable evidence for the development of more personalized treatments in ASD.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderChild Development Disorders, PervasiveBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolHumansObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesBiomarkersAutism spectrum disorderBiomarkerElectroencephalographyExcitatory/inhibitory imbalanceGeneticsSpectroscopySymptom severityTrajectories

Identifiers

PMID36991382
PMCPMC10054232
OpenAlexW4361296044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.