Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36991377›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental health : a global access science source2023

Effects of air pollution on restricted activity days: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pablo Orellano, Julieta Reynoso, Nancy Quaranta

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pablo OrellanoConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina. porellano@frsn.utn.edu.ar.
Julieta ReynosoHospital General "San Felipe", San Nicolás, Argentina.
Nancy QuarantaUniversidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad Regional San Nicolás, Colon 332, San Nicolas de los Arroyos, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe adverse effects of air pollution on human health include many diseases and health conditions associated with mortality, morbidity and disability. One example of these outcomes that can be translated into economic costs is the number of days of restricted activity. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of outdoor exposure to particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 10 and 2.5 μm (PM

methodsObservational epidemiological studies with different study designs were included, and pooled relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated for an increase of 10 μg/m

resultsWe included 18 articles in the quantitative analysis. Associations between pollutants and restricted activity days in time-series studies of short-term exposures, measured as work-loss days, school-loss days, or both were significant for PM

conclusionRestricted activity days and related outcomes were associated with some of the pollutants under evaluation, as shown in studies with different designs. In some cases, we were able to calculate pooled relative risks that can be used for quantitative modelling.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionEnvironmental PollutantsOzoneCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmental ExposureHumansNitrogen DioxideObservational Studies as TopicParticulate MatterAir PollutantsEnvironmental PollutantsNitrogen DioxideOzoneParticulate MatterAbsenteeismAir pollutionMeta-analysisObservational studySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36991377
PMCPMC10061989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.