Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36991375›Full record

Observational studyBMC urology2023

Impact of previous malignancy at diagnosis on oncological outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Hongda Zhao, Kang Liu, Stilianos Giannakopoulos, Emrah Yuruk, Geert De Naeyer, Mario Álvarez-Maestro, Chi-Fai Ng, Pilar Laguna, Jean De La Rosette, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hongda ZhaoS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Kang LiuS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Stilianos GiannakopoulosDepartment of Urology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Emrah YurukDepartment of Urology, The Ministry of Health, University of Health Sciences, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Geert De NaeyerDepartment of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Mario Álvarez-MaestroDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Chi-Fai NgS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Pilar LagunaDepartment of Urology, Medipol Mega Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Jean De La RosetteDepartment of Urology, Medipol Mega Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Jeremy Yuen-Chun TeohS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. jeremyteoh@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence of prognostic factors and individualized surveillance strategies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma are still weak.

objectivesTo evaluate whether the history of previous malignancy (HPM) affects the oncological outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

methodsThe CROES-UTUC registry is an international, observational, multicenter cohort study on patients diagnosed with UTUC. Patient and disease characteristics from 2380 patients with UTUC were collected. The primary outcome of this study was recurrence-free survival. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed by stratifying patients according to their HPM.

resultsA total of 996 patients were included in this study. With a median recurrence-free survival time of 7.2 months and a median follow-up time of 9.2 months, 19.5% of patients had disease recurrence. The recurrence-free survival rate in the HPM group was 75.7%, which was significantly lower than non-HPM group (82.7%, P = 0.012). Kaplan-Meier analyses also showed that HPM could increase the risk of upper tract recurrence (P = 0.048). Furthermore, patients with a history of non-urothelial cancers had a higher risk of intravesical recurrence (P = 0.003), and patients with a history of urothelial cancers had a higher risk of upper tract recurrence (P = 0.015). Upon multivariate Cox regression analysis, the history of non-urothelial cancer was a risk factor for intravesical recurrence (P = 0.004), and the history of urothelial cancer was a risk factor for upper tract recurrence (P = 0.006).

conclusionBoth previous non-urothelial and urothelial malignancy could increase the risk of tumor recurrence. But different cancer types may increase different sites' risk of tumor recurrence for patients with UTUC. According to present study, more personalized follow-up plans and active treatment strategies should be considered for UTUC patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCohort StudiesHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNephrectomyPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesIntravesical recurrenceOutcome assessmentPrevious malignancyUrothelial carcinomaUTUC

Identifiers

PMID36991375
PMCPMC10061966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.