ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023
Artificial intelligence-aided lytic spinal bone metastasis classification on CT scans.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting tumor bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- YOLOv5 Attention Analysis for Anterior Eye Disease Classification: Grad-CAM++ Feature Importance and Cut-and-Paste Validation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Uncertainty Quantification in Automated Detection of Vertebral Metastasis Using Ensemble Monte Carlo Dropout.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- A Deep Learning Model for Comprehensive Automated Bone Lesion Detection and Classification on Staging Computed Tomography Scans.Academic radiology · 2025Article
- Applications and Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Metastasis Imaging: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Deep Learning-Based Differentiation of Vertebral Body Lesions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Automated detection and classification of osteolytic lesions in panoramic radiographs using CNNs and vision transformers.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in bone Metastases: A systematic review in guideline adherence of 92 studies.Journal of bone oncology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in fracture detection on radiographs: a literature review.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- AI-Assisted Detection and Localization of Spinal Metastatic Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Oncologic Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning Methods in CT Spine Imaging-A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Detection, Management, and Prognosis of Bone Metastasis: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- How AI May Transform Musculoskeletal Imaging.Radiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSpinal bone metastases directly affect quality of life, and patients with lytic-dominant lesions are at high risk for neurological symptoms and fractures. To detect and classify lytic spinal bone metastasis using routine computed tomography (CT) scans, we developed a deep learning (DL)-based computer-aided detection (CAD) system.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 2125 diagnostic and radiotherapeutic CT images of 79 patients. Images annotated as tumor (positive) or not (negative) were randomized into training (1782 images) and test (343 images) datasets. YOLOv5m architecture was used to detect vertebra on whole CT scans. InceptionV3 architecture with the transfer-learning technique was used to classify the presence/absence of lytic lesions on CT images showing the presence of vertebra. The DL models were evaluated via fivefold cross-validation. For vertebra detection, bounding box accuracy was estimated using intersection over union (IoU). We evaluated the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic curve to classify lesions. Moreover, we determined the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. We used the gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) technique for visual interpretation.
resultsThe computation time was 0.44 s per image. The average IoU value of the predicted vertebra was 0.923 ± 0.052 (0.684-1.000) for test datasets. In the binary classification task, the accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC value for test datasets were 0.872, 0.948, 0.741, 0.832, and 0.941, respectively. Heat maps constructed using the Grad-CAM technique were consistent with the location of lytic lesions.
conclusionOur artificial intelligence-aided CAD system using two DL models could rapidly identify vertebra bone from whole CT images and detect lytic spinal bone metastasis, although further evaluation of diagnostic accuracy is required with a larger sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.