Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36991276›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023

Artificial intelligence-aided lytic spinal bone metastasis classification on CT scans.

Yuhei Koike, Midori Yui, Satoaki Nakamura, Asami Yoshida, Hideki Takegawa, Yusuke Anetai, Kazuki Hirota, Noboru Tanigawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuhei KoikeDepartment of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan. koikeyuh@hirakata.kmu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3963-4257
Midori YuiDepartment of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Satoaki NakamuraDepartment of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Asami YoshidaDepartment of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Hideki TakegawaDepartment of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Yusuke AnetaiDepartment of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Kazuki HirotaDepartment of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Noboru TanigawaDepartment of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Kansai Medical University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K16742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSpinal bone metastases directly affect quality of life, and patients with lytic-dominant lesions are at high risk for neurological symptoms and fractures. To detect and classify lytic spinal bone metastasis using routine computed tomography (CT) scans, we developed a deep learning (DL)-based computer-aided detection (CAD) system.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 2125 diagnostic and radiotherapeutic CT images of 79 patients. Images annotated as tumor (positive) or not (negative) were randomized into training (1782 images) and test (343 images) datasets. YOLOv5m architecture was used to detect vertebra on whole CT scans. InceptionV3 architecture with the transfer-learning technique was used to classify the presence/absence of lytic lesions on CT images showing the presence of vertebra. The DL models were evaluated via fivefold cross-validation. For vertebra detection, bounding box accuracy was estimated using intersection over union (IoU). We evaluated the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic curve to classify lesions. Moreover, we determined the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. We used the gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) technique for visual interpretation.

resultsThe computation time was 0.44 s per image. The average IoU value of the predicted vertebra was 0.923 ± 0.052 (0.684-1.000) for test datasets. In the binary classification task, the accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC value for test datasets were 0.872, 0.948, 0.741, 0.832, and 0.941, respectively. Heat maps constructed using the Grad-CAM technique were consistent with the location of lytic lesions.

conclusionOur artificial intelligence-aided CAD system using two DL models could rapidly identify vertebra bone from whole CT images and detect lytic spinal bone metastasis, although further evaluation of diagnostic accuracy is required with a larger sample size.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBone NeoplasmsBone and BonesHumansQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligenceBone metastasisDeep learningLytic bone metastasisSpine

Identifiers

PMID36991276
OpenAlexW4361294126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.