Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36991269›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2024

Sexual and reproductive complications and concerns of survivors of childhood, adolescent and adult cancer.

Brigitte Gerstl, Christina Signorelli, Claire E Wakefield, Rebecca Deans, Tejnei Vaishnav, Karen Johnston, Kristen Neville, Richard J Cohn, Antoinette Anazodo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Counseling and use of surrogacy among cancer survivors (CUSACS).Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brigitte GerstlKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Childrens Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Christina SignorelliKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Childrens Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Claire E WakefieldKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Childrens Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Rebecca DeansSchool of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Randwick Clinical Campus, Discipline of Paediatrics, UNSW , Sydney, Australia.
Tejnei VaishnavFertility Research Centre, The Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Karen JohnstonKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Childrens Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Kristen NevilleSchool of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Randwick Clinical Campus, Discipline of Paediatrics, UNSW , Sydney, Australia.
Richard J CohnKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Childrens Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Antoinette AnazodoKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Childrens Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia. Antoinette.anazodo@health.nsw.gov.au.
UNSW Sydney · AUSydney Children's Hospital · AURoyal Hospital for Women · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer survivors may experience infertility and sexual dysfunction following cancer treatment. Survivors report significant gaps in oncofertility care and consider these issues important, yet they are rarely discussed. The aims of this study were to evaluate survivors' sexual and reproductive complications across age groups and to identify specific groups of survivors at risk for sexual and reproductive complications.

methodWe report data collected from survivors of cancers diagnosed in childhood, adolescence and adulthood following the development and piloting of a reproductive survivorship patient reported outcome measure (RS-PROM).

resultsOne hundred and fifty survivors participated in the study (mean age at cancer diagnosis was 23.2 years [SD, 10.3 years]). About 68% of participants expressed concerns about their sexual health and function. Survivors (50%) expressed at least one body image concern, with the female gender the most common risk factor for all subgroups. A total of 36% of participants reported at least one concern regarding their fertility, with more male than female survivors reporting fertility preservation prior to treatment. Females compared with male participants were more likely to feel less physically attractive after treatment (OR = 3.83, 95% CI = 1.84-7.95, p < 0.001). More females than males were also more likely to feel dissatisfied with the appearance of a scar(s) after treatment (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.13-4.91, p = 0.02).

conclusionThe RS-PROM identified multiple reproductive complications and concerns for cancer survivors in the survivorship period. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Utilising the RS-PROM in conjunction with a clinic appointment could help identify and address cancer patients' concerns and symptoms.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalAdolescentAdultChildFemaleFertility PreservationHumansInfertilityMaleYoung AdultCancerOncofertility sexual healthPatient-reported outcomesReproductive healthSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID36991269
PMCPMC11324690
OpenAlexW4361295478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.