Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36991173›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2023

Minimal Morphoelastic Models of Solid Tumour Spheroids: A Tutorial.

Benjamin J Walker, Giulia L Celora, Alain Goriely, Derek E Moulton, Helen M Byrne

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin J WalkerDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. bjw43@bath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0853-267X
Giulia L CeloraDepartment of Mathematics, University College London, Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0AY, UK.
Alain GorielyMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Derek E MoultonMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Helen M ByrneMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumour spheroids have been the focus of a variety of mathematical models, ranging from Greenspan's classical study of the 1970 s through to contemporary agent-based models. Of the many factors that regulate spheroid growth, mechanical effects are perhaps some of the least studied, both theoretically and experimentally, though experimental enquiry has established their significance to tumour growth dynamics. In this tutorial, we formulate a hierarchy of mathematical models of increasing complexity to explore the role of mechanics in spheroid growth, all the while seeking to retain desirable simplicity and analytical tractability. Beginning with the theory of morphoelasticity, which combines solid mechanics and growth, we successively refine our assumptions to develop a somewhat minimal model of mechanically regulated spheroid growth that is free from many unphysical and undesirable behaviours. In doing so, we will see how iterating upon simple models can provide rigorous guarantees of emergent behaviour, which are often precluded by existing, more complex modelling approaches. Perhaps surprisingly, we also demonstrate that the final model considered in this tutorial agrees favourably with classical experimental results, highlighting the potential for simple models to provide mechanistic insight whilst also serving as mathematical examples.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSpheroids, CellularHumansMathematical ConceptsModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalMathematical modellingMorphoelasticityStress-dependent growthTumour dynamics

Identifiers

PMID36991173
PMCPMC10060352
OpenAlexW4361294671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.