Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36991061›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Quantum architecture search via truly proximal policy optimization.

Xianchao Zhu, Xiaokai Hou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xianchao ZhuSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, 450001, China. xczhuiffs@163.com.
Xiaokai HouInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantum Architecture Search (QAS) is a process of voluntarily designing quantum circuit architectures using intelligent algorithms. Recently, Kuo et al. (Quantum architecture search via deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.07715, 2021) proposed a deep reinforcement learning-based QAS (QAS-PPO) method, which used the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm to automatically generate the quantum circuit without any expert knowledge in physics. However, QAS-PPO can neither strictly limit the probability ratio between old and new policies nor enforce well-defined trust domain constraints, resulting in poor performance. In this paper, we present a new deep reinforcement learning-based QAS method, called Trust Region-based PPO with Rollback for QAS (QAS-TR-PPO-RB), to automatically build the quantum gates sequence from the density matrix only. Specifically, inspired by the research work of Wang, we employ an improved clipping function to implement the rollback behavior to limit the probability ratio between the new strategy and the old strategy. In addition, we use the triggering condition of the clipping based on the trust domain to optimize the policy by restricting the policy within the trust domain, which leads to guaranteed monotone improvement. Experiments on several multi-qubit circuits demonstrate that our presented method achieves better policy performance and lower algorithm running time than the original deep reinforcement learning-based QAS method.

Identifiers

PMID36991061
PMCPMC10060432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.