ArticleScientific reports2023
Application of image processing and transfer learning for the detection of rust disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of multi-mode analytics for enhanced plant stress evaluation.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Pooled it
- Beech leaf disease symptom detection using deep learning and computer vision tools.Journal of nematology · 2026Article
- A computationally efficient hybrid framework combining deep feature extraction and gradient boosting for early diagnosis of Olive leaf diseases.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identification of plant-parasitic nematode genera in turfgrass using deep learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Breeding for Plant Disease Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Enhanced hybrid attention deep learning for avocado ripeness classification on resource constrained devices.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The pipelines of deep learning-based plant image processing.Quantitative plant biology · 2025Review
- Optimized classification of potato leaf disease using EfficientNet-LITE and KE-SVM in diverse environments.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant diseases introduce significant yield and quality losses to the food production industry, worldwide. Early identification of an epidemic could lead to more effective management of the disease and potentially reduce yield loss and limit excessive input costs. Image processing and deep learning techniques have shown promising results in distinguishing healthy and infected plants at early stages. In this paper, the potential of four convolutional neural network models, including Xception, Residual Networks (ResNet)50, EfficientNetB4, and MobileNet, in the detection of rust disease on three commercially important field crops was evaluated. A dataset of 857 positive and 907 negative samples captured in the field and greenhouse environments were used. Training and testing of the algorithms were conducted using 70% and 30% of the data, respectively where the performance of different optimizers and learning rates were tested. Results indicated that EfficientNetB4 model was the most accurate model (average accuracy = 94.29%) in the disease detection followed by ResNet50 (average accuracy = 93.52%). Adaptive moment estimation (Adam) optimizer and learning rate of 0.001 outperformed all other corresponding hyperparameters. The findings from this study provide insights into the development of tools and gadgets useful in the automated detection of rust disease required for precision spraying.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.