ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2023
Response of wild rodents to red fox feces: implication for the echinococcus infection.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Winter is coming … How the hoarding behaviour of rodents fosters the persistence ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Echinococcus multilocularis causes zoonotic disease, alveolar echinococcosis. The life cycle of E. multilocularis is maintained by the predator-prey relationship between red foxes and rodents. Infection to red fox (Vulpes vulpes) of E. multilocularis is considered that rodents take eggs of E. multilocularis, then red fox forage the rodents. However, it has been not known how to take eggs by rodents. On infection process of E. multilocularis from red foxes to rodents, we predicted that rodents would forage or touch with feces of red fox to use undigested materials within the feces. We monitored rodent's response to fox feces and their distance to the feces by using camera trap from May to October 2020. Myodes spp. and Apodemus spp. touched fox feces, and touch rate of Apodemus spp. was significantly higher than that of Myodes spp. We found smelling and passing as contact behaviors to fox feces by Myodes spp., while Apodemus spp. showed behaviors which oral directly contacted feces. There was no significant difference on the shortest distance between Apodemus spp. and Myodes spp. The distance between 0 cm and 5 cm was mostly observed for both rodents. The results that Myodes spp. did not forage feces and their contact to feces was low frequency suggested that the infection from red foxes to Myodes spp., the main intermediate host, was to be other pathways. The approach to feces and the act near feces might increase the probability attached with eggs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.