Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36990787›Full record

ArticleFukushima journal of medical science2023

Comparison of student self-assessment and teacher assessment of medical interview performance during bedside learning.

Zunyi Tang, Yayoi Shikama, Koji Otani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fukushima journal of medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Self-Assessment Versus Peer Assessment of Oncology Communication Skills in Medical Students: A Video-Based Pilot Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Intelligent Assessment Systems in Medical Education: A Systematic Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2025
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zunyi TangCenter for Medical Education and Career Development, Fukushima Medical University.
Yayoi ShikamaCenter for Medical Education and Career Development, Fukushima Medical University.
Koji OtaniCenter for Medical Education and Career Development, Fukushima Medical University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and efficient self-assessment is a critical skill for medical students to develop as part of their professional development. Along with clinical training reform at Fukushima Medical University, rubric-based student self-assessment and teacher assessment of students' performance using our proposed assessment tool, which includes several aspects of clinical skills and abilities, was initiated to improve the clinical clerkship process. To investigate how students identified their weaknesses and strengths, we analyzed the results of 119 fourth-year medical students' self-assessment and corresponding teacher assessment. Our study revealed substantial consistency between student self-assessment and teacher assessment, despite some overestimation and underestimation in student self-assessments. Students who incorrectly assess themselves require a variety of feedback to increase their self-efficacy and self-confidence, as well as to identify their weaknesses.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceHumansSelf-Assessmentclerkshipmedical educationoverestimationstudent self-assessmentunderestimation

Identifiers

PMID36990787
PMCPMC10122972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.