Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36990740›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2024

Effect of Deep Learning Reconstruction on Respiratory-triggered T2-weighted MR Imaging of the Liver: A Comparison between the Single-shot Fast Spin-echo and Fast Spin-echo Sequences.

Kengo Kiso, Takahiro Tsuboyama, Hiromitsu Onishi, Kazuya Ogawa, Atsushi Nakamoto, Mitsuaki Tatsumi, Takashi Ota, Hideyuki Fukui, Keigo Yano, Toru Honda and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Enhanced Visualization of Intracranial Cortical Arteries Using Deep Learning Reconstruction in Vessel Wall MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. MR Imaging of the Upper Urinary Tract: Techniques, Diagnostic Performance, and Imaging Biomarkers.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Utility of Thin-slice Single-shot T2-weighted MR Imaging with Deep Learning Reconstruction as a Protocol for Evaluating Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Utility of Thin-slice Fat-suppressed Single-shot T2-weighted MR Imaging with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction as a Protocol for Evaluating the Pancreas.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kengo KisoDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.
Takahiro TsuboyamaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.
Hiromitsu OnishiDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.
Kazuya OgawaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.
Atsushi NakamotoDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.
Mitsuaki TatsumiDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.
Takashi OtaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.
Hideyuki FukuiDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.
Keigo YanoDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.
Toru HondaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.
Shinji KakemotoDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.
Yoshihiro KoyamaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Hospital.
Hiroyuki TarewakiDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Hospital.
Noriyuki TomiyamaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.
The University of Osaka · JPOsaka University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the effects of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) on respiratory-triggered T2-weighted MRI of the liver between single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) and fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences.

methodsRespiratory-triggered fat-suppressed liver T2-weighted MRI was obtained with the FSE and SSFSE sequences at the same spatial resolution in 55 patients. Conventional reconstruction (CR) and DLR were applied to each sequence, and the SNR and liver-to-lesion contrast were measured on FSE-CR, FSE-DLR, SSFSE-CR, and SSFSE-DLR images. Image quality was independently assessed by three radiologists. The results of the qualitative and quantitative analyses were compared among the four types of images using repeated-measures analysis of variance or Friedman's test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively, and a visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis was performed to evaluate the image quality improvement by DLR on the FSE and SSFSE sequences.

resultsThe liver SNR was lowest on SSFSE-CR and highest on FSE-DLR and SSFSE-DLR (P < 0.01). The liver-to-lesion contrast did not differ significantly among the four types of images. Qualitatively, noise scores were worst on SSFSE-CR but best on SSFSE-DLR because DLR significantly reduced noise (P < 0.01). In contrast, artifact scores were worst both on FSE-CR and FSE-DLR (P < 0.01) because DLR did not reduce the artifacts. Lesion conspicuity was significantly improved by DLR compared with CR in the SSFSE (P < 0.01) but not in FSE sequences for all readers. Overall image quality was significantly improved by DLR compared with CR for all readers in the SSFSE (P < 0.01) but only one reader in the FSE (P < 0.01). The mean area under the VGC curve values for the FSE-DLR and SSFSE-DLR sequences were 0.65 and 0.94, respectively.

conclusionIn liver T2-weighted MRI, DLR produced more marked improvements in image quality in SSFSE than in FSE.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLiver NeoplasmsArtifactsHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingartifactsdeep learninglivermagnetic resonance imagingspin echo imaging

Identifiers

PMID36990740
PMCPMC11024712
OpenAlexW4361303650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.