Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36990513›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular cell biology2023

SARS-CoV-2 spike variants differ in their allosteric responses to linoleic acid.

A Sofia F Oliveira, Deborah K Shoemark, Andrew D Davidson, Imre Berger, Christiane Schaffitzel, Adrian J Mulholland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Sofia F OliveiraSchool of Chemistry, Centre for Computational Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8753-4950
Deborah K ShoemarkSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1240-8463
Andrew D DavidsonSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1136-4008
Imre BergerSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7518-9045
Christiane SchaffitzelSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1516-9760
Adrian J MulhollandSchool of Chemistry, Centre for Computational Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1015-4567
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L01386X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R016445/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 106115/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 210701/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contains a functionally important fatty acid (FA) binding site, which is also found in some other coronaviruses, e.g. SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. The occupancy of the FA site by linoleic acid (LA) reduces infectivity by 'locking' the spike in a less infectious conformation. Here, we use dynamical-nonequilibrium molecular dynamics (D-NEMD) simulations to compare the allosteric responses of spike variants to LA removal. D-NEMD simulations show that the FA site is coupled to other functional regions of the protein, e.g. the receptor-binding motif (RBM), N-terminal domain (NTD), furin cleavage site, and regions surrounding the fusion peptide. D-NEMD simulations also identify the allosteric networks connecting the FA site to these functional regions. The comparison between the wild-type spike and four variants (Alpha, Delta, Delta plus, and Omicron BA.1) shows that the variants differ significantly in their responses to LA removal. The allosteric connections to the FA site on Alpha are generally similar to those on the wild-type protein, with the exception of the RBM and the S71-R78 region, which show a weaker link to the FA site. In contrast, Omicron is the most different variant, exhibiting significant differences in the RBM, NTD, V622-L629, and furin cleavage site. These differences in the allosteric modulation may be of functional relevance, potentially affecting transmissibility and virulence. Experimental comparison of the effects of LA on SARS-CoV-2 variants, including emerging variants, is warranted.

Indexed as

COVID-19FurinHumansLinoleic AcidSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusFurinLinoleic AcidSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2allosteric modulationD-NEMD simulationsfatty acid binding siteSARS-CoV-2 spikeSARS-CoV-2 variants

Identifiers

PMID36990513
PMCPMC10563148
OpenAlexW4361302065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.