Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36990482›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Effects of a computerised diagnostic decision support tool on diagnostic quality in emergency departments: study protocol of the DDx-BRO multicentre cluster randomised cross-over trial.

Thimo Marcin, Stefanie C Hautz, Hardeep Singh, Laura Zwaan, David Schwappach, Gert Krummrey, Stefan K Schauber, Mathieu Nendaz, Aristomenis Konstantinos Exadaktylos, Martin Müller and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05346523 (Effects of Digitalized Differential Diagnosis Broadening Using a Computerized Diagnostic Decision Support Tool on Diagnostic Quality in Emergency Room Patients - a Multi-centre Cluster Randomized Cross-over Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05346523 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Digitalized Differential Diagnosis Broadening Using a Computerized Diagnostic Decision Support Tool on Diagnostic Quality in Emergency Room Patients - a Multi-centre Cluster Randomized Cross-over Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInsel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRan2022 to 2023Enrolled1,218ConditionsEmergencies, Diagnoses DiseaseArmsIsabel Pro - The DDx generator (CDDS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Thimo MarcinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7229-5985
Stefanie C HautzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4715-8465
Hardeep SinghCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4419-8974
Laura ZwaanInstitute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam (iMERR), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
David SchwappachInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8668-3065
Gert KrummreyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Stefan K SchauberCenter for Educational Measurement and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1832-2732
Mathieu NendazDepartment of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneve, Switzerland.
Aristomenis Konstantinos ExadaktylosDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Martin MüllerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Cornelia LambriggerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Thomas C SauterDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Gregor LindnerDepartment of Internal and Emergency Medicine, Burgerspital Solothurn, Solothurn, Switzerland.
Simon BosbachSpital Tiefenau, Insel Gruppe AG, Bern, Switzerland.
Ines GriesshammerSpital Muensingen, Insel Gruppe AG, Bern, Switzerland.
Wolf E HautzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland wolf.hautz@insel.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-2445-984X
University of Bern · CHSpital Thurgau (Switzerland) · CHErasmus MC · NLMichael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · USSolothurner Spitäler · CHUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionComputerised diagnostic decision support systems (CDDS) suggesting differential diagnoses to physicians aim to improve clinical reasoning and diagnostic quality. However, controlled clinical trials investigating their effectiveness and safety are absent and the consequences of its use in clinical practice are unknown. We aim to investigate the effect of CDDS use in the emergency department (ED) on diagnostic quality, workflow, resource consumption and patient outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, outcome assessor and patient-blinded, cluster-randomised, multiperiod crossover superiority trial. A validated differential diagnosis generator will be implemented in four EDs and randomly allocated to a sequence of six alternating intervention and control periods. During intervention periods, the treating ED physician will be asked to consult the CDDS at least once during diagnostic workup. During control periods, physicians will not have access to the CDDS and diagnostic workup will follow usual clinical care. Key inclusion criteria will be patients' presentation to the ED with either fever, abdominal pain, syncope or a non-specific complaint as chief complaint. The primary outcome is a binary diagnostic quality risk score composed of presence of an unscheduled medical care after discharge, change in diagnosis or death during time of follow-up or an unexpected upscale in care within 24 hours after hospital admission. Time of follow-up is 14 days. At least 1184 patients will be included. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay, diagnostics and data regarding CDDS usage, physicians' confidence calibration and diagnostic workflow. Statistical analysis will use general linear mixed modelling methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by the cantonal ethics committee of canton Berne (2022-D0002) and Swissmedic, the Swiss national regulatory authority on medical devices. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, open repositories and the network of investigators and the expert and patients advisory board. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05346523.

Indexed as

HospitalizationResearch DesignCross-Over StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicaccident & emergency medicinedecision makinghealth informaticsinformation managementinternal medicinequality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36990482
PMCPMC10069571
OpenAlexW4361299673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.