ArticleESMO open2023
Implementation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency testing in Europe.
Article in ESMO open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Model-based meta-analysis of individual patient data for the characterization of intravenous 5-fluorouracil population pharmacokinetics.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Clinical Benefits and Utility of Pretherapeutic DPYD and UGT1A1 Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the PREPARE Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- DPYD and UGT1A1 Genotype-Based Dosing for Fluoropyrimidines and Irinotecan Chemotherapy: Variant-Specific Impact on Treatment Intensity and Toxicity.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- The Impact of Upfront DihydroPyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) Testing on the Therapeutic Management of Patients Scheduled for 5-FU.Cancer medicine · 2026Observational
- UGT1A1 and irinotecan: Ready for routine pharmacogenetic care.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Advancing Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry: A Descriptive Pilot Study Integrating Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacokinetics in Long-Acting Antipsychotic Treatment.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Limited Visibility and Perception of the Clinical Relevance of Clopidogrel Pharmacogenetics in Cardiology Literature.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- Pharmacogenetic testing in Italy: results of a nationwide survey by the Joint Working Group for the pharmacogenetics implementation in Italy.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of pharmacogenomics: Current achievements and future directions.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- Uptake of DPYD and UGT1A1 testing in Italy and adherence to pharmacogenetic guidelines: A 5-year perspective from an EQA provider.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Do Socio-Economic Determinants Influence DPYD Testing? A Real-World Study of 1478 Cancer Patients Receiving Fluoropyrimidine Chemotherapy.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing in Italy: a review of evidence and multidisciplinary consensus on key priorities for implementation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Global Investigation of Clinical Implementation Strategies for DPYD Testing to Guide Fluoropyrimidine Therapy.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Genotyping of DPYD and UGT1A1 in Brazilian oncological patients: applying pharmacogenomics in an admixed population.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Genomics in Health and Biomedicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Prevalence of actionable pharmacogenomic variants in Brazilian patients with cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Severe toxicity following genotype-guided reduced 5-FU dose in a heterozygous DPYD c.2846A>T carrier with stage III anal carcinoma: A case report.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2025Article
- Advancements in the diagnosis and management of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- DPD Ultra-Rapid Metabolizer Status and Efficacy of 5-Fluorouracil Treatment: A Real-World Study.Fundamental & clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe main cause for fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity is deficiency of the metabolizing enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). In 2020, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended two methods for pre-treatment DPD deficiency testing in clinical practice: phenotyping using endogenous uracil concentration or genotyping for DPYD risk variant alleles. This study assessed the DPD testing implementation status in Europe before (2019) and after (2021) the release of the EMA recommendations.
methodsThe survey was conducted from 16 March 2022 to 31 July 2022. An electronic form with seven closed and three open questions was e-mailed to 251 professionals with DPD testing expertise of 34 European countries. A descriptive analysis was conducted.
resultsWe received 79 responses (31%) from 23 countries. Following publication of the EMA recommendations, 87% and 75% of the countries reported an increase in the amount of genotype and phenotype testing, respectively. Implementation of novel local guidelines was reported by 21 responders (27%). Countries reporting reimbursement of both tests increased in 2021, and only four (18%) countries reported no coverage for any testing type. In 2019, major implementation drivers were 'retrospective assessment of fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity' (39%), and in 2021, testing was driven by 'publication of guidelines' (40%). Although the major hurdles remained the same after EMA recommendations-'lack of reimbursement' (26%; 2019 versus 15%; 2021) and 'lack of recognizing the clinical relevance by medical oncologists' (25%; 2019 versus 8%; 2021)-the percentage of specialists citing these decreased. Following EMA recommendations, 25% of responders reported no hurdles at all in the adoption of the new testing practice in the clinics.
conclusionsThe EMA recommendations have supported the implementation of DPD deficiency testing in Europe. Key factors for successful implementation were test reimbursement and clear clinical guidelines. Further efforts to improve the oncologists' awareness of the clinical relevance of DPD testing in clinical practice are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.