Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36989883›Full record

ArticleESMO open2023

Implementation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency testing in Europe.

M de With, A Sadlon, E Cecchin, V Haufroid, F Thomas, M Joerger, R H N van Schaik, R H J Mathijssen, C R Largiadèr, ‘The Working Group on the Implementation of DPD-deficiency Testing in Europe’

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. UGT1A1 and irinotecan: Ready for routine pharmacogenetic care.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genomics in Health and Biomedicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

M de WithDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
A SadlonDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital & University of Bern, INO F, Bern, Switzerland.
E CecchinDepartment Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
V HaufroidLouvain Center for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (LTAP), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
F ThomasInstitut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole and CRCT, University of Toulouse, Inserm, Toulouse, France.
M JoergerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Klinik für Medizinische Onkologie & Hämatologie, Kantonsspital, St.Gallen, Switzerland.
R H N van SchaikDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
R H J MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
C R LargiadèrDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital & University of Bern, INO F, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: Carlo.Largiader@insel.ch.
‘The Working Group on the Implementation of DPD-deficiency Testing in Europe’
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEErasmus MC · NLInstitut Claudius Regaud · FRIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main cause for fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity is deficiency of the metabolizing enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). In 2020, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended two methods for pre-treatment DPD deficiency testing in clinical practice: phenotyping using endogenous uracil concentration or genotyping for DPYD risk variant alleles. This study assessed the DPD testing implementation status in Europe before (2019) and after (2021) the release of the EMA recommendations.

methodsThe survey was conducted from 16 March 2022 to 31 July 2022. An electronic form with seven closed and three open questions was e-mailed to 251 professionals with DPD testing expertise of 34 European countries. A descriptive analysis was conducted.

resultsWe received 79 responses (31%) from 23 countries. Following publication of the EMA recommendations, 87% and 75% of the countries reported an increase in the amount of genotype and phenotype testing, respectively. Implementation of novel local guidelines was reported by 21 responders (27%). Countries reporting reimbursement of both tests increased in 2021, and only four (18%) countries reported no coverage for any testing type. In 2019, major implementation drivers were 'retrospective assessment of fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity' (39%), and in 2021, testing was driven by 'publication of guidelines' (40%). Although the major hurdles remained the same after EMA recommendations-'lack of reimbursement' (26%; 2019 versus 15%; 2021) and 'lack of recognizing the clinical relevance by medical oncologists' (25%; 2019 versus 8%; 2021)-the percentage of specialists citing these decreased. Following EMA recommendations, 25% of responders reported no hurdles at all in the adoption of the new testing practice in the clinics.

conclusionsThe EMA recommendations have supported the implementation of DPD deficiency testing in Europe. Key factors for successful implementation were test reimbursement and clear clinical guidelines. Further efforts to improve the oncologists' awareness of the clinical relevance of DPD testing in clinical practice are needed.

Indexed as

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase DeficiencyAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)EuropeFluorouracilHumansRetrospective StudiesAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)FluorouracilDPD deficiencyDPYDfluoropyrimidineimplementation surveypre-therapeutic testingtoxicity

Identifiers

PMID36989883
PMCPMC10163157
OpenAlexW4361027014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.