Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36989235›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Maternal perception of fetal movements: Views, knowledge and practices of women and health providers in a low-resource setting.

Katinka Weller, Natasha Housseine, Rashid S Khamis, Tarek Meguid, G Justus Hofmeyr, Joyce L Browne, Marcus J Rijken

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A machine learning model for assessing fetal health during pregnancy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Katinka WellerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2808-5993
Natasha HousseineJulius Global Health, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1849-7815
Rashid S KhamisSchool of Health and Medical Sciences, The State University of Zanzibar, Zanzibar, Tanzania.
Tarek MeguidDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar, Tanzania.
G Justus HofmeyrEffective Care Research Unit, Eastern Cape Department of Health, University of the Witwatersrand/Walter Sisulu University, East London, South Africa.
Joyce L BrowneJulius Global Health, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7048-3245
Marcus J RijkenJulius Global Health, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0914-5508
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLErasmus MC · NLUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Copenhagen · DKWestern Cape Department of Health · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study assessed perception, knowledge, and practices regarding maternal perception of fetal movements (FMs) among women and their healthcare providers in a low-resource setting. Semi-structured interviews, questionnaires and focus group discussions were conducted with 45 Zanzibar women (18 antenatal, 28 postpartum) and 28 health providers at the maternity unit of Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar, Tanzania. Descriptive and thematic analyses were conducted to systematically extract subthemes within four main themes 1) knowledge/awareness, 2) behavior/practice, 3) barriers, and 4) ways to improve practice. Within the main themes it was found that 1) Women were instinctively aware of (ab)normal FM-patterns and healthcare providers had adequate knowledge about FMs. 2) Women often did not know how to monitor FMs or when to report concerns. There was inadequate assessment and management of (ab)normal FMs. 3) Barriers included the fact that women did not feel free to express concerns. Healthcare providers considered FM-awareness among women as low and unreliable. There was lack of staff, time and space for FM-education, and no protocol for FM-management. 4) Women and health providers recognised the need for education on assessment and management of (ab)normal FMs. In conclusion, women demonstrated adequate understanding of FMs and perceived abnormalities of these movements better than assumed by health providers. There is a need for more evidence on the effect of improving knowledge and awareness of FMs to construct evidence-based guidelines for low resource settings.

Identifiers

PMID36989235
PMCPMC10058116
OpenAlexW4361296077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.