Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36989212›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

A structural equation modelling approach to understanding the determinants of childhood vaccination in Nigeria, Uganda and Guinea.

James Bell, Belinda Lartey, Marcos Fernandez, Natasha Darrell, Holly Exton-Smith, Cassie Gardner, Emily Richards, Abolaji Akilo, Emmanuel Odongo, James Ssenkungu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

James BellIpsos Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2265-1205
Belinda LarteyIpsos Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.
Marcos FernandezIpsos Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.
Natasha DarrellIpsos Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.
Holly Exton-SmithIpsos Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.
Cassie GardnerIpsos Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.
Emily RichardsIpsos Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.
Abolaji AkiloIpsos Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria.
Emmanuel OdongoIpsos Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
James SsenkunguIpsos Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Rigobert Kotchi KouadioCiblage, Dakar, Senegal.
Mamadi CisséCiblage, Conakry, Guinea.
Axel Bruno Ayiya Igowa RérambyahCiblage, Abidjan, Ivory Coast.
Maikol AdouCiblage, Abidjan, Ivory Coast.
Rebecca WestIpsos Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2958-0884
Sunny SharmaIpsos Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.
Ipsos (United Kingdom) · GBBoston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines have contributed to reductions in morbidity and mortality from preventable diseases globally, but low demand for vaccination threatens to reverse these gains. Explorations of the determinants of vaccination uptake may rely on proxy variables to describe complex phenomena and construct models without reference to underlying theories of vaccine demand. This study aimed to use the results of a formative qualitative study (described elsewhere) to construct and test a model to explain the determinants of vaccination uptake. Using the results of a survey among more than 3,000 primary caregivers of young children in Nigeria, Uganda and Guinea, factor analysis produced six explanatory factors. We then estimated the effects of each of these factors on uptake of immunization using a structural equation model. The results showed that the probability that a child is fully vaccinated increases if a caregiver has support from others to vaccinate them (B = 0.33, β = 0.21, p<0.001) and if caregivers had poor experiences with the healthcare system (B = 0.09, β = 0.09, p = 0.007). Conversely, the probability of full vaccination decreases if the caregiver's husband exerts control over her decision-making ability (B = -0.29, β = -0.20, p<0.001), or if the caregiver perceives vaccines to be of low importance (B = -0.37, β = -0.27, p<0.001). Belief in religious protection (B = -0.07, β = -0.05, p = 0.118) and a belief that vaccines are harmful (B = -0.12, β = -0.04, p = 0.320) did not have an observed effect on vaccination status. This research suggests that interventions may benefit from that including entire families and communities in their design.

Identifiers

PMID36989212
PMCPMC10058155
OpenAlexW4361298311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.