ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2023
B
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of supervised and unsupervised deep learning strategies for denoising hyperpolarizedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Optimizing Xenon 129 Ventilation MRI in Cystic Fibrosis with Spiral Imaging and Flip-Angle Correction.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2025Article
- Evaluation of an integrated variable flip angle protocol to estimate coil BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Quantifying Spatial Distribution of Ventilation Defects in Multiple Pulmonary Diseases With HyperpolarizedJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Article
- A decay-modeled compressed sensing reconstruction approach for non-Cartesian hyperpolarizedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Analytical corrections for BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo mitigate signal variations caused by inhomogeneous RF and magnetization decay in hyperpolarized THEORY AND
methodsAnalytical expressions to predict signal intensity and uncertainty in flip-angle measurements were derived from the Bloch equations and validated by simulations and phantom experiments. Imaging in
resultsMean measured flip angle showed excellent agreement with the applied flip angle in simulations (R
conclusionsFlip-angle maps were obtained using sequentially acquired, 2D spiral,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.